FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  
to hear the Bishop of Stepney again. My own experience, especially as to "Red Pottage" and "Prisoners," struck me as so direful, I seemed so peculiarly outside the protection of Providence, like the celebrated plot of ground on which "no rain nor no dew never fell," that I consulted several other brother and sister novelists as to how they had fared in this delicate matter. It is not for me to reveal the interesting skeletons concealed in cupboards not my own, but I have almost invariably returned from these interviews cheered, chuckling, and consoled by the comfortable realisation that others had writhed on a hotter gridiron than I. Georges Sand, when she was accused of lampooning a certain _abbe_, said that to draw one character of that kind one must know a thousand. She has, I think, put her finger on the truth which is not easy to find--at least, I never found it until I read those words of hers. It is necessary to know a very large number of persons of a certain kind before one can evolve a type. Each he or she contributes a twig, and the author weaves them into a nest. I have no doubt that I must have taken such a twig from nearly every clergyman I met who had a _soupcon_ of Mr. Gresley in him. But if an author takes one tiny trait, one saying, one sentiment, direct from a person, there is always the danger that the contributor will recognise the theft, and, if of a self-regarding temperament, will instantly conclude that the _whole_ character is drawn from himself. There is, for instance, no more universal trait, of what has been unkindly called "the old-maid temperament" in either sex, than the assertion that it is always busy. But when such a trait is noted in a book, how many sensitive readers assume that it is a cruel personality. If people could but perceive that what they think to be character in themselves is often only sex, or sexlessness; if they could but believe in the universality of what they hold to be their individuality! And yet how easily they believe in it when it is pleasant to do so, when they write books about themselves, and thousands of grateful readers bombard the gifted authoress with letters to tell her that they also have "felt just like that," and have "been helped" by her exquisite sentiments, which are the exact replicas of their own! The worst of it is that with the academic or clerical prig, when the mind has long been permitted to run in a deep, platitudinous groove from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

character

 

author

 
temperament
 

readers

 
conclude
 

academic

 

instantly

 

instance

 

called

 

replicas


unkindly

 
universal
 

Gresley

 

groove

 
platitudinous
 
sentiment
 
direct
 

danger

 

contributor

 
clerical

recognise
 

permitted

 

person

 

thousands

 
sexlessness
 
grateful
 

gifted

 

bombard

 

perceive

 

universality


easily
 

pleasant

 

individuality

 

people

 

assertion

 

helped

 

sentiments

 

exquisite

 

authoress

 
personality

assume

 
sensitive
 
letters
 

persons

 

delicate

 
matter
 

reveal

 
interesting
 

novelists

 
brother