FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>  
kling was the recognized leader of the three hundred and six who constituted the compact body of the supporters of General Grant. Suggestions were made that the substitution of Mr. Conkling's name for General Grant's name would give the nomination to Mr. Conkling, and there was a moment of time when General Garfield anticipated or apprehended such a result. There was, however, never a moment of time when such a result was possible. The three hundred and six would never have consented to the use of any name in place of General Grant's name unless General Grant's name were first withdrawn by his authority. A firmer obstacle even would have been found in Mr. Conkling's sturdy refusal to allow the use of his name under such circumstances. Among the friends of General Grant the thought of such a proceeding was never entertained, although the suggestion was made, but without authority, probably, from those charged with the management of the organizations engaged in the struggle. After many years had passed, and the proceedings of the convention were well-nigh forgotten, Mr. John Russell Young printed a letter in which he made the charge that Conkling, Cameron, Boutwell, and Lincoln had concealed the contents of a letter from General Grant in which he directed them as his representatives to withdraw his name from the convention. Mr. Young was in error in two particulars. Lincoln was not named in the letter. General Logan was the fourth person to whom the letter was addressed. Young brought the letter from Galena, where Grant then was, and he claims that the letter was addressed to himself. General Frederick D. Grant, who was then at Chicago, claims that the letter was addressed to him, and that, after reading it, he handed it to Mr. Conkling. As late as the first half of the year 1897, Mr. Conkling's papers had not been examined carefully. The contents of the letter are important, and for the present the evidence is circumstantial; but to me it is conclusive against Mr. Young's statement that Conkling, Cameron, Logan, and Boutwell were directed by General Grant to withdraw his name from the convention. I cannot now say that I read the letter, but of its receipt and the contents I had full knowledge, and I referred to it in these words in a letter to my daughter dated May 31, 1880: "Grant sent for Young to visit him at Galena. Young returned to-day, and says that Grant directed him to say to Cameron, Logan,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>  



Top keywords:

General

 

letter

 

Conkling

 

convention

 
addressed
 

Cameron

 

contents

 
directed
 

authority

 
Galena

Lincoln

 
Boutwell
 

claims

 

withdraw

 
moment
 

hundred

 

result

 

brought

 

daughter

 

person


Frederick

 

particulars

 

returned

 
fourth
 

receipt

 

evidence

 
present
 

important

 

circumstantial

 

statement


conclusive

 

carefully

 

examined

 

knowledge

 
reading
 

Chicago

 
referred
 

handed

 

papers

 
consented

withdrawn

 

sturdy

 
refusal
 

firmer

 
obstacle
 

apprehended

 
compact
 
constituted
 

leader

 
recognized