FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>  
the world had already acknowledged that "pure" Darwinism or natural selection cannot explain the origin of new organs or new forms. And now Mendelism destroys the other supposed foundation for biological evolution, by showing that small variations cannot be accumulated into large differences equal in value to a unit character or a new species. Thus the whole foundation of biological evolution has been completely undermined by these new discoveries; and were it not for the wide-spread credence the evolutionary theory has already received, and the intellectual momentum it has acquired tending to carry it on by its inertia into the future, it could be only a very short time now before the elaborate treatises attempting to orientate with it all the facts of religion and history would have to be consigned to the shelves labeled, "Of Historic Interest." For as Bateson remarked in his recent address as President before the British Association at Melbourne, Australia, the new knowledge of heredity shows that whatever evolution there is occurs by loss of factors and not by gain, and that in this way the progress of science is "destroying much that till lately passed for gospel."[32] [Footnote 32: In commenting on these views of Bateson, Prof. S.C. Holmes, of the University of California, well speaks of them as "an illustration of _the bankruptcy of present evolutionary theory."--Science_, September 3, 1915.] V Let us sum up the situation. We began this chapter with the question, Have new kinds of plants and animals originated in modern times comparable in all essential respects with the idea of true species? The answer of modern science is reluctantly obtained, but it is a negative. De Vries and others have indeed originated new kinds that were loudly hailed as new species, and are doubtless as deserving of specific rank as many already listed for years in the treatises of specialists. Indeed there is every reason to believe that almost countless numbers of our taxonomic species have originated from common ancestral originals. But as these so-called species are now known to be freely or moderately cross fertile with other related species, their hybrids following the ordinary laws of Mendelian inheritance, we see that they are not true species but mere analytic varieties. In short, we now know that our taxonomic classifications have been marked off on altogether too narrow lines. This has tended greatly to confuse th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>  



Top keywords:

species

 

originated

 

evolution

 
science
 
evolutionary
 

treatises

 
theory
 

Bateson

 

modern

 

taxonomic


foundation
 

biological

 

animals

 

essential

 

comparable

 
narrow
 

respects

 

negative

 

obtained

 
reluctantly

altogether

 
answer
 

tended

 

September

 

illustration

 

bankruptcy

 

present

 
Science
 

question

 

greatly


marked

 

chapter

 

confuse

 

situation

 

plants

 

hailed

 

called

 

originals

 

ancestral

 

common


freely

 

inheritance

 

fertile

 

hybrids

 

moderately

 

Mendelian

 
ordinary
 

numbers

 

specific

 

varieties