FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776  
777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   >>  
preceded the Alexandrians. The _Andromeda_ of Euripides, he declares (23), "became in his hands one of the most brilliant examples of chivalrous love." This, however, is a pure assumption on his part, not warranted by the few fragments of this play that have been preserved. Benecke has devoted a special "Excursus" to this play (203-205), in which he justly remarks that readers of Greek literature "need hardly be reminded of how utterly foreign to the Greek of Euripides's day is the conception of the '_galante Ritter_' setting out in search of ladies that want rescuing." He might have brought out the humor of the matter by quoting the characteristically Greek version of the Perseus story given by Apollodorus, who relates dryly (II., chap. 4) that Cepheus, in obedience to an oracle, bound his daughter to a rock to be devoured by a sea monster. "Perseus saw her, fell in love with her, and promised Cepheus to slaughter the monster _if he would promise to give him the rescued daughter to marry_. The contract was made and Perseus undertook the adventure, killed the monster and rescued Andromeda." Nothing could more strikingly reveal the difference between Hellenic and modern ideas regarding lovers than the fact that to the Greek mind there was nothing disgraceful in this selfish, ungallant bargain made by Perseus as a condition of his rescuing the poor girl from a horrible death. A mediaeval knight, or a modern gentleman, not to speak of a modern lover, would have saved her at the risk of his own life, reward or no reward. The difference is further emphasized by the attitude of the girl, who exclaims to her deliverer, "Take me, O stranger, for thine handmaiden, or wife, or slave." Professor Murray, who cites this line in his _History of Greek Literature_, remarks with comic naivete: "The love-note in this pure and happy sense Euripides had never struck before." But what is there so remarkably "pure and happy" in a girl's offering herself as a slave to a man who has saved her life? Were not Greek women always expected to assume that attitude of inferiority, submission, and self-sacrifice? Was not _Alcestis_ written to enforce that principle of conduct? And does not that very exclamation of Andromeda show how utterly antipodal the situation and the whole drama of Euripides were to modern ideas of chivalrous love? Having just mentioned Benecke, I may as well add here that his own theory regarding the first appearance of the ro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776  
777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   >>  



Top keywords:

modern

 

Perseus

 

Euripides

 

monster

 

Andromeda

 

rescuing

 

Cepheus

 
utterly
 
daughter
 
difference

reward

 

attitude

 

rescued

 

Benecke

 

remarks

 

chivalrous

 

Alexandrians

 

Professor

 
Murray
 

handmaiden


stranger

 

History

 

preceded

 
naivete
 

Literature

 

gentleman

 

mediaeval

 

knight

 
declares
 

exclaims


deliverer

 

struck

 

emphasized

 

Having

 
situation
 
antipodal
 

exclamation

 

mentioned

 

theory

 

appearance


conduct

 

offering

 

horrible

 

remarkably

 
expected
 

assume

 

Alcestis

 

written

 
enforce
 

principle