FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697  
698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   >>   >|  
ttle. He laughed, so Plutarch tells us in his biographic sketch, at those who, while exercising care in raising dogs and horses, allowed unworthy husbands to have offspring. This, in itself, was a praiseworthy thought; but the method adopted by Lycurgus to overcome that objection was subversive of all morality and affection. He considered it advisable that among worthy men there should be a community of wives and children, for which purpose he tried to suppress jealousy, ridiculing those who insisted on a conjugal monopoly and who even engaged in fights on account of it. Elderly men were urged to share their wives with younger men and adopt the children as their own; and if a man considered another's wife particularly prolific or virtuous he was not to hesitate to ask for her. Bridegrooms followed the custom of capturing their brides. An attendant, after cutting off the bride's hair and putting a man's garment on her, left her alone in the dark, whereupon her bridegroom visited her, returning soon, however, to his comrades. For months--sometimes until after children had been born--the husband would thus be unable to see his wife. Reading Greek literature in the light of modern science, it is interesting to note that we have in the foregoing account unmistakable allusions to several primitive customs which have prevailed among savages and barbarians in all parts of the world.[308] The Greek writers, ignorant of the revelations of anthropology regarding the evolution of human habits, assumed such customs to have been originated by particular lawgivers. This was natural enough and pardonable under the circumstances; but how any modern writer can consider such customs (whether aboriginal or instituted by lawgivers) especially favorable to love, passes my comprehension. Yet one of the best informed of my critics assured me that "in Sparta love was made a part of state policy, and opportunities were contrived for the young men and women to see each other at public games and become enamored." As usual in such cases, the writer ignores the details regarding these Spartan opportunities for seeing one another and falling in love, which would have spoiled his argument by indicating what kind of "love" was in question here. Plutarch relates that Lycurgus made the girls strip naked and attend certain festivals and dance in that state before the youths, who were also naked. Bachelors who refused to marry were not allowed to atten
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697  
698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

customs

 

children

 
account
 

lawgivers

 

considered

 
allowed
 

modern

 

Plutarch

 
opportunities
 

writer


Lycurgus

 

passes

 

favorable

 

instituted

 
aboriginal
 

habits

 

writers

 

ignorant

 

barbarians

 

allusions


primitive

 

prevailed

 

savages

 

revelations

 

anthropology

 

pardonable

 

circumstances

 

natural

 

evolution

 
assumed

originated

 

question

 

relates

 
indicating
 
falling
 
spoiled
 

argument

 

attend

 
Bachelors
 

refused


youths

 
festivals
 
Spartan
 
Sparta
 

policy

 

contrived

 
unmistakable
 

assured

 

informed

 

critics