FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250  
251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   >>  
urishing state which secures its liberty, and renders it respectable throughout Europe_.' "But it may be said, a nation ought not to permit others to decide on her rights and claims. Why not? Will the decision be less consistent with justice, from being impartial and disinterested? It is a maxim confirmed by universal experience, that no man should be judge in his own cause; and are nations less under the influence of interest and of passion than individuals? Are they not, in fact, still less under the control of moral obligation? Treaties have often been violated by statesmen and senators, who would have shrunk from being equally faithless in their private contracts. Is it to be supposed that the government of a friendly power, in a controversy between us and France, in which it had no interest, and with the observation of the civilized world directed to its decision, would be less likely to pronounce a fair and impartial judgment than either France or ourselves? "But we can decide our own controversies for ourselves, it is said; that is, we can go to war and take our chance for the result. Alas, 'it is an error,' says Vattel, 'no less absurd than pernicious, to say that war is to _decide_ controversies between those who, as in the case of nations, acknowledge no judge. It is _power_ or _prudence_ rather than right that victory usually declares for.'--Book III. Chap. 3. "The United States chose to decide for themselves the controversy about impressment, by appealing to the sword. In this appeal they of course placed no reliance on the propriety and justice of their claims, since such considerations could have no influence on the fate of battle; but they depended solely on their capacity to inflict more injury than they would receive themselves, and this difference in the amount of injury was to turn the scale in our favor. Our expectations, however, were disappointed. Our commerce was annihilated, our frontier towns were laid in ashes, our capital taken, our attempts upon Canada were repulsed, with loss and disgrace; our people became burthened with taxes, and we were at last glad to accept a treaty of peace which, instead of containing, as we had fondly hoped, a formal surrender on the part of Great Britain of the right of impressment, made not the slightest all
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250  
251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   >>  



Top keywords:

decide

 

interest

 

impressment

 
injury
 

nations

 
influence
 

controversies

 

France

 

controversy

 
decision

justice

 

impartial

 

claims

 

solely

 

depended

 

capacity

 

amount

 
receive
 
battle
 
secures

inflict

 

difference

 
considerations
 

renders

 

appealing

 

respectable

 

United

 
States
 

liberty

 

expectations


propriety

 

reliance

 

appeal

 

commerce

 

treaty

 

accept

 

fondly

 
slightest
 

Britain

 
formal

surrender

 

burthened

 

frontier

 

annihilated

 

urishing

 

disappointed

 

capital

 

disgrace

 

people

 

repulsed