FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>  
* * CANADA, ETC. (Vol. vii., pp. 380. 504.) My former Note on the origin of this name suggests a question, which, if you think it worthy of a place in "N. & Q.," may interest many besides myself, viz. At what period and by whom was that part of North America called Canada? To the French it appears always to have been known as "La Nouvelle France." La Hontan, who quitted the country 1690, I think, calls it Canada. Lajitan certainly does, as well as many other old authors. In a map of North America, date 1769, the tract bordering on the St. Lawrence, lately called Upper and Lower Canada, is designated "The Province of Quebec;" whilst the region to the northward, lying between it and Hudson's Bay, has the word Canada in much larger letters, as if a general name of the whole. That the name is slightly altered from an Indian word is probable, but not so that it was used by the Indians themselves, who, in the first place, were not in the habit of imposing general names on large districts, although they had significant ones for almost every locality; the former were usually denominated the land of the Iroquois, of the Hurons, &c., _i. e._ of the people dwelling, on, and in possession of it. Even allowing that the Indians may have had a general name for the country, it is very unlikely that one so unmeaning as "Kanata" would have been imposed upon it by a people whose nomenclature in every other case is so full of meaning. Moreover, although the Mic-macs of Gaspe may have called themselves Canadians according to Lescarbot, yet we are told by Volney, that-- "The Canadian savages call themselves 'Metoktheniakes' (born of the sun), without allowing themselves to be persuaded of the contrary by the Black Robes," &c.--Vol. ii. p. 438. The following, to the same purpose, is from the _Quarterly Review_, vol. iv. p. 463.: "'Tapoy,' which we understand from good authority to be the generic appellation by which the North American tribes distinguish themselves from the whites," &c. {602} Now I should imagine both Lescarbot and Champlain, knowing nothing of the language, and probably having very bad interpreters, must have made a great mistake in supposing the Gaspesiens called themselves Canadians, for I have questioned several intelligent Mic-Macs on the subject, and they have invariably told me that they call themselves "Ulnookh" or "Elnouiek," "_Ninen elnouiek!--We are Men._
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>  



Top keywords:

called

 

Canada

 

general

 
Indians
 

America

 
Canadians
 

Lescarbot

 

people

 
country
 
allowing

Volney

 

savages

 
Metoktheniakes
 
persuaded
 
Canadian
 

contrary

 

imposed

 

Kanata

 

unmeaning

 
nomenclature

possession

 
Moreover
 

meaning

 

understand

 

mistake

 

supposing

 
Gaspesiens
 
questioned
 

language

 

interpreters


intelligent

 

Elnouiek

 

elnouiek

 

Ulnookh

 

subject

 

invariably

 

knowing

 
dwelling
 

Review

 

purpose


Quarterly
 

authority

 
generic
 
imagine
 
Champlain
 

whites

 

appellation

 
American
 
tribes
 

distinguish