basement. (_f_) Mukhalingas and koshas are still used in worship.
(_g_) There are verandahs resembling those at Angkor Wat. They have
sloping stone roofs, sculptures in relief on the inside wall and a
series of windows in the outside wall. (_h_) The doors of the Linga
shrines have a serpentine ornamentation and are very like those of the
Bayon. (_i_) A native gentleman told me that he had seen temples with
five towers in this neighbourhood, but I have not seen them myself.]
[Footnote 261: _E.g._ Mahendravarman, Narasinhavarman,
Paramesvaravarman, etc. It may be noticed that Pattadkal is
considerably to the N.W. of Madras and that the Pallavas are supposed
to have come from the northern part of the present Madras Presidency.
Though the Hindus who emigrated to Camboja probably embarked in the
neighbourhood of Madras, they may have come from countries much
further to the north. Varman is recognized as a proper termination of
Kshatriya names, but it is remarkable that it is found in _all_ the
Sanskrit names of Cambojan kings and is very common in Pallava names.
The name of Asvatthaman figures in the mythical genealogies of both
the Pallavas and the kings of Champa or perhaps of Camboja, see
_B.E.F.E.O._ 1904, p. 923.]
[Footnote 262: Some authorities think that Kaundinya is meant by the
wicked king, but he lived about 300 years before I-Ching's visit and
the language seems to refer to more recent events. Although
Bhavavarman is not known to have been a religious innovator he appears
to have established a new order of things in Camboja and his
inscriptions show that he was a zealous worshipper of Siva and
other Indian deities. It would be even more natural if I-Ching
referred to Isanavarman (c. 615) or Jayavarman I (c. 650), but
there is no proof that these kings were anti-buddhist.]
[Footnote 263: Schiefner, p. 262.]
[Footnote 264: See Maspero, _L'Empire Khmer_, pp. 24 ff.]
[Footnote 265: Perhaps a second Bhavavarman came between these last
two kings; see Coedes in _B.E.F.E.O._ 1904, p 691.]
[Footnote 266: See Mecquenem in _B.E.F.E.O._ 1913, No. 2.]
[Footnote 267: But the captivity is only an inference and not a
necessary one. Finot suggests that the ancient royal house of Fu-nan
may have resided at Java and have claimed suzerain rights over Camboja
which Jayavarman somehow abolished. The only clear statements on the
question are those in the Sdok Kak Thom inscription, Khmer text c. 72,
which tell us that Ca
|