FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  
e asked, _touching or concerning the said inquiry, or relative thereto_. What is to be understood by this last sentence, I would willingly be informed; I would hear how far the _relation_ to the inquiry is designed to be extended, with what other _inquiries_ it is to be complicated, and where the chain of interrogatories is to have an end. When an evidence appears before the committee, how can he be certain that the questions asked are _relative to the inquiry?_ How can he be certain that they are such as he may procure an indemnity by resolving? Or whether they are not unconnected with the principal question, and therefore insidious and dangerous? And to what power must he appeal, if he should be prosecuted afterwards upon his own confession, on pretence that it was not _relative to the inquiry?_ Expressions like these, my lords, if they are not the effects of malicious hurry, and negligent animosity, must be intended to vest the committee with absolute authority, with the award of life and death, by leaving to them the liberty to explain the statute at their own pleasure, to contract or enlarge the relation to the controversy, to inquire without bounds, and judge without control. Thus, my lords, I have laid before you my opinion of this bill without any partial regard, without exaggerating the ill consequences that may be feared from it, or endeavouring to elude any reasoning by which it has been defended. I have endeavoured to pursue the arguments of the noble lord who spoke first, and to show that it is founded upon false notions of criminal justice, that it proposes irrational and illegal methods of trial, that it will produce consequences fatal to our constitution, and establish a precedent of oppression. I have endeavoured, in examining the arguments by which the bill has been defended, to show that the rights of the publick are ascertained, and that the power of the majority is to be limited by moral considerations; and to prove, in discussing its particular parts, that it is inaccurate, indeterminate, and unintelligible. What effects my inquiry may have had upon your lordships, yourselves only can tell; for my part, the necessity of dwelling so long upon the question, has added new strength to my conviction; and so clearly do I now see the danger and injustice of a law like this, that though I do not imagine myself indued with any peculiar degree of heroism, I believe, that if I were condemned to a ch
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

inquiry

 

relative

 
committee
 

effects

 

question

 
relation
 

endeavoured

 

consequences

 

defended

 

arguments


constitution

 

establish

 
precedent
 

examining

 
reasoning
 
oppression
 
produce
 

methods

 

pursue

 

rights


founded

 

notions

 
illegal
 

irrational

 

proposes

 

criminal

 
justice
 

strength

 

heroism

 

conviction


necessity

 

dwelling

 

degree

 

imagine

 

peculiar

 

injustice

 

danger

 
discussing
 

indued

 

considerations


condemned

 

ascertained

 
majority
 
limited
 

inaccurate

 

lordships

 

endeavouring

 
indeterminate
 

unintelligible

 

publick