FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   >>  
other day, by Mr Baring, that "great _facts_" are very "_great follies!_" Now let us once more ask the question--would all these desperate and long-continued exertions and sacrifices--(all proceeding, be it ever observed, from _one_ quarter, and from the same class of people--nay, the same individuals of that class)--be requisite, were there any _real movement of the public mind and feeling_ against the Corn-laws? Are they not requisite solely because of the _absence_ of any such movement? Nay, are they not evidence that the public feeling and opinion are against them? And that, perhaps, they will by and by succeed in rousing the "stubborn enthusiasm of the people" against themselves? Where has there been called one single spontaneous public meeting of any importance, and where exhibited a spark of enthusiasm, for the total repeal of the Corn-laws? Surely the _topic_ is capable of being handled in a sufficiently exciting manner! But no; wherever a "meeting," or "demonstration," is heard of--there, also, are the eternal Cobden, Bright and Wilson, and their miserable fellow-agitators, who alone have got up--who alone harangue the meetings. Was it so with Catholic Emancipation?--with the abolition of Negro Slavery?--with the Reform Bill? Right or wrong, the public feeling was then roused, and exhibited itself unequivocally, powerfully, and spontaneously; but _here_--bah! common sense revolts at the absurd supposition that even hundreds of thousands of pounds can of themselves get up a real demonstration of public feeling in favour of the object, for which so much Manchester money has been already subscribed. "'Tis not in _thousands_ to command success." If the public opinion of this great country--this great enlightened nation--were _really_ roused against the Corn-laws, they would disappear like snow under sunshine. But, as the matter _now_ stands, if their dreary drivellers Cobden, Bright, Wilson, Acland, W.J. Fox, were withdrawn from the public scene in which they are so anxious to figure, and sent to enjoy the healthy exercise of the tread-mill for one single three months, would this eternal "_brutum fulmen_" about the repeal of the Corn-laws be heard of any more? We verily believe not. "But look at our triumphs!"--quoth Cobden--"Look at our glorious victories at Durham, London, and Kendal!--our virtual victory at Salisbury!" Moonshine, gentlemen, and you know it;--and that you have spent your money in vain.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   >>  



Top keywords:

public

 

feeling

 

Cobden

 

single

 

opinion

 

roused

 

thousands

 

enthusiasm

 

demonstration

 

eternal


Wilson

 

Bright

 

exhibited

 
repeal
 

meeting

 

movement

 
people
 
requisite
 

command

 

Durham


London

 

success

 
triumphs
 

country

 

victories

 

glorious

 

subscribed

 

virtual

 

hundreds

 

gentlemen


Moonshine

 

pounds

 

supposition

 

revolts

 

absurd

 

victory

 

Manchester

 

favour

 

object

 

Salisbury


Kendal

 

nation

 

common

 
withdrawn
 

brutum

 

anxious

 

exercise

 

healthy

 
figure
 
months