FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
e Letter 428.) It would be a fairer trial to cut off the eyes of the tail-feathers of male peacocks; but who would sacrifice the beauty of their bird for a whole season to please a mere naturalist? LETTER 434. TO J. JENNER WEIR. Down, February 29th [1868]. I have hardly ever received a note which has interested me more than your last; and this is no exaggeration. I had a few cases of birds perceiving slight changes in the dress of their owners, but your facts are of tenfold value. I shall certainly make use of them, and need not say how much obliged I should be for any others about which you feel confident. Do you know of any birds besides some of the gallinaceae which are polygamous? Do you know of any birds besides pigeons, and, as it is said, the raven, which pair for their whole lives? Many years ago I visited your brother, who showed me his pigeons and gave me some valuable information. Could you persuade him (but I fear he would think it high treason) to stain a male pigeon some brilliant colour, and observe whether it excited in the other pigeons, especially the females, admiration or contempt? For the chance of your liking to have a copy and being able to find some parts which would interest you, I have directed Mr. Murray to send you my recent book on "Variation under Domestication." P.S.--I have somewhere safe references to cases of magpies, of which one of a pair has been repeatedly (I think seven times) killed, and yet another mate was always immediately found. (434/1. On this subject see "Descent of Man," Edition I., Volume II., page 104, where Mr. Weir's observations were made use of. This statement is quoted from Jenner ("Phil. Trans." 1824) in the "Descent of Man" (1901), page 620.) A gamekeeper told me yesterday of analogous case. This perplexes me much. Are there many unmarried birds? I can hardly believe it. Or will one of a pair, of which the nest has been robbed, or which are barren, always desert his or her mate for a strange mate with the attraction of a nest, and in one instance with young birds in the nest? The gamekeeper said during breeding season he had never observed a single or unpaired partridge. How can the sexes be so equally matched? P.S. 2nd.--I fear you will find me a great bore, but I will be as reasonable as can be expected in plundering one so rich as you. P.S. 3rd.--I have just received a letter from Dr. Wallace (434/2. See "Descent of Man," Edition I., Volume I
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
pigeons
 

Descent

 

Volume

 

gamekeeper

 

Edition

 

season

 
received
 
magpies
 

repeatedly

 
Variation

statement

 

references

 
observations
 

immediately

 

Domestication

 

subject

 

killed

 

equally

 
matched
 
partridge

unpaired

 

breeding

 
observed
 
single
 

letter

 

Wallace

 

reasonable

 
expected
 

plundering

 

yesterday


analogous

 

perplexes

 

Jenner

 

desert

 
strange
 

attraction

 
instance
 

barren

 
robbed
 

unmarried


quoted

 

brilliant

 

exaggeration

 
perceiving
 

interested

 

slight

 

owners

 

tenfold

 

February

 
feathers