FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  
d _Declamation_ is the orthodox and most pious Method of writing in behalf of _Orthodoxy_. Dr. _Rogers_, to whom you write, falls into the Method of Buffoonery, Banter, Satire, Drollery, Ridicule, and Irony, even in the Treatise to which your Letter is subjoined, and against that _Person_ whom you would have punish'd for that Method: When he says to him, [42] "Religion then, it seems, must be left to the Scholars and Gentlefolks, and to them 'tis to be of no other use, but as a Subject of Disputation to improve their Parts and Learning; but methinks the Vulgar might be indulged a little of it now and then, upon Sundays and Holidays, instead of Bull-baiting and Foot-ball." And this insipid Piece of Drollery and false Wit [which is design'd to ridicule his Adversary for asserting, that _What Men understand nothing of, they have no Concern about_; which is a Proposition that will stand the Test of _Ridicule_, which will be found wholly to lie against the Doctor, for asserting the Reasonableness of imposing Things on the People which they do not understand] is the more remarkable, as it proceeds from one, who is at the same time for using the Sword of the Magistrate against his Adversary. One would think the [43] _Inquisitor_ should banish the _Droll_, and the _Droll_ the _Inquisitor_. One of the greatest and best Authorities for the _pleasant_ and _ironical_ manner of treating _serious_ Matters, is that eminent Divine at the Time of the Reformation, the great _Erasmus_, who has written two Books in this way with great Applause of Protestants, and without subjecting himself to any Persecution of Papists: which makes it highly proper to propose them to the Consideration of the Reader, that he may regulate his Notions, by what, it may be presum'd, he approves of in that Author. These two Books of _Erasmus_ are his _Colloquies_, and his _Praise of Folly_. His _Colloquies_ were wrote in imitation of _Lucian_'s _Dialogues_; and I think with equal, if not superior, Success. Both these Authors had an Aversion to sullen, austere, designing Knaves; and both of them being Men of Wit and Satire, employ'd their Talents against _Superstition_ and _Hypocrisy_. _Lucian_ liv'd in an Age when _Fiction_ and _Fable_ had usurp'd the Name of _Religion_, and _Morality_ was corrupted by _Men_ of _Beard_ and _Grimace_, but scandalously _Leud_ and _Ignorant_; who yet had the Impudence to preach up _Virtue_, and style themselves _Philosophers_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Method

 

Adversary

 

asserting

 
Lucian
 

Colloquies

 

Erasmus

 

Inquisitor

 
understand
 

Drollery

 

Religion


Ridicule

 

Satire

 
presum
 

writing

 

behalf

 
Reader
 

approves

 

regulate

 

Notions

 

imitation


Praise
 

Consideration

 
Author
 

highly

 

Rogers

 

Orthodoxy

 

written

 

Divine

 
Reformation
 

Applause


Protestants
 

Papists

 

proper

 

Persecution

 
subjecting
 

propose

 

Dialogues

 

Morality

 
corrupted
 

Fiction


Grimace

 

scandalously

 

Virtue

 

Philosophers

 
preach
 

Ignorant

 

Impudence

 

Hypocrisy

 
Authors
 

orthodox