FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392  
393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   >>   >|  
erest and the deepest concern of the entire Lutheran Church in Germany. Numerous opinions of the various synods and theologians arrived during the winter of 1551 to 1552. With the exception of the Wuerttemberg _Response (Responsum)_, written by John Brenz, and the _Opinion_ of Matthew Vogel, both of whom regarded Osiander's teaching as differing from the doctrine received by the Lutheran Church in terms and phrases rather than in substance, they were unfavorable to Osiander. At the same time all, including the opinions of Brenz and Vogel, revealed the fact that the Lutherans, the theologians of Wittenberg as well as those of Jena, Brandenburg, Pomerania, Hamburg, etc., were firmly united in maintaining Luther's doctrine, _viz._, that the righteousness of faith is not the essential righteousness of the Son of God, as Osiander held but the obedience of Christ the God-man imputed by grace to all true believers as their sole righteousness before God. Feeling safe under the protection of Duke Albrecht, and apparently not in the least impressed by the general opposition which his innovations met with at the hands of the Lutherans, Osiander continued the controversy by publishing his _Proof (Beweisung) that for Thirty Years I have Always Taught the Same Doctrine_. And irritated by an opinion of Melanchthon (whom Osiander denounced as a pestilential heretic), published with offensive explanations added by the Wittenbergers, he in the same year (April, 1552) wrote his _Refutation (Widerlegung) of the Unfounded, Unprofitable Answer of Philip Melanchthon_. In this immoderate publication Osiander boasted that only the Philippian rabble, dancing according to the piping of Melanchthon, was opposed to him. Before long, however, also such opponents of the Philippists as Flacius, Gallus, Amsdorf, and Wigand were prominently arraigned against Osiander. Meanwhile (May 23, 1552) Moerlin published a large volume entitled: _Concerning the Justification of Faith_. Osiander replied in his _Schmeckbier_ of June 24 1552, a book as keen as it was coarse. In 1552 and 1553 Flacius issued no less than twelve publications against Osiander, one of them bearing the title: _Zwo fuernehmliche Gruende Osiandri verlegt, zu einem Schmeckbier_; another: _Antidotum auf Osiandri giftiges Schmeckbier_. (Preger 2, 551) When the controversy had just about reached its climax, Osiander died, October 17, 1552. Soon after, the Duke enjoined silence on both partie
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392  
393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Osiander

 

Schmeckbier

 

righteousness

 
Melanchthon
 

controversy

 

Osiandri

 

published

 

Lutherans

 

doctrine

 
opinions

theologians

 
Church
 
Lutheran
 

Flacius

 
Meanwhile
 

Before

 

prominently

 

Philippists

 
opponents
 
Gallus

Amsdorf

 
Wigand
 

arraigned

 

Refutation

 
Widerlegung
 

Unfounded

 

Unprofitable

 
explanations
 

offensive

 

Wittenbergers


Answer

 

Philip

 

dancing

 

rabble

 

piping

 

opposed

 

Philippian

 

Moerlin

 

immoderate

 

publication


boasted

 

coarse

 
Preger
 

giftiges

 

Antidotum

 

reached

 

enjoined

 
silence
 

partie

 

climax