FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  
any Liberal who was on my side on that occasion. Excepting the Liberal, no other party, as a party, acted against me. I am not complaining of them; I deserved nothing else at their hands. They could not undo in 1845, even had they wished it, (and there is no proof they did,) what they had done in 1841. In 1845, when I had already given up the contest for four years, and my part in it had passed into the hands of others, then some of those who were prominent against me in 1841, feeling (what they had not felt in 1841) the danger of driving a number of my followers to Rome, and joined by younger friends who had come into University importance since 1841 and felt kindly towards me, adopted a course more consistent with their principles, and proceeded to shield from the zeal of the Hebdomadal Board, not me, but, professedly, all parties through the country,--Tractarians, Evangelicals, Liberals in general,--who had to subscribe to the Anglican formularies, on the ground that those formularies, rigidly taken, were, on some point or other, a difficulty to all parties alike. However, besides the historical fact, I can bear witness to my own feeling at the time, and my feeling was this:--that those who in 1841 had considered it to be a duty to act against me, had then done their worst. What was it to me what they were now doing in opposition to the New Test proposed by the Hebdomadal Board? I owed them no thanks for their trouble. I took no interest at all, in February, 1845, in the proceedings of the Heads of Houses and of the Convocation. I felt myself _dead_ as regarded my relations to the Anglican Church. My leaving it was all but a matter of time. I believe I did not even thank my real friends, the two Proctors, who in Convocation stopped by their Veto the condemnation of Tract 90; nor did I make any acknowledgment to Mr. Rogers, nor to Mr. James Mozley, nor, as I think, to Mr. Hussey, for their pamphlets in my behalf. My frame of mind is best described by the sentiment of the passage in Horace, which at the time I was fond of quoting, as expressing my view of the relation that existed between the Vice-Chancellor and myself. "Pentheu, Rector Thebarum, quid me perferre patique Indignum cogas?" "Adimam bona." "Nempe pecus, rem, Lectos, argentum; tollas licet." "In manicis et Compedibus, saevo te sub custode tenebo." (_viz. the 39 Articles._) "_Ipse Deus, simul atque vo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

feeling

 

Liberal

 

formularies

 

Hebdomadal

 

parties

 
friends
 

Anglican

 

Convocation

 
Rogers
 

proceedings


Mozley
 
February
 

Hussey

 

interest

 
behalf
 

acknowledgment

 

pamphlets

 

matter

 

relations

 
Church

leaving

 

regarded

 
Houses
 

condemnation

 

Proctors

 

stopped

 
quoting
 

Lectos

 
argentum
 
Adimam

tollas

 

tenebo

 
custode
 

Compedibus

 

manicis

 

Articles

 

trouble

 

Indignum

 

expressing

 
relation

sentiment

 

passage

 

Horace

 

existed

 

Thebarum

 
perferre
 

patique

 

Rector

 

Chancellor

 
Pentheu