FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   1343   1344  
1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352   1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   >>   >|  
tances your memorialists earnestly request that you will use your influence as leader of the House of Commons and of the government to secure the passing of the bill introduced by Mr. Jacob Bright, either as a substantive enactment, or as an integral portion of the next measure that shall be passed dealing with the question of the representation of the people. Signed on behalf of the conference, CAROLINE M. TAYLOR, _President_. The first vote that was given by the new parliament was on April 7, 1875, Mr. Forsyth having moved the second reading in an able speech. It at once became manifest that the question had made great progress in the country. In spite of the loss of the seventy friends at the preceding general election, our strength in the new parliament had greatly increased. Including tellers and pairs, 170 voted for the bill, and only 250 against. This result appears to have alarmed our opponents, who proceeded to form an association of peers, members of parliament and other influential persons, to resist the claims of women to the suffrage. They issued a circular which will be read by future generations with a smile of amazement.[544] It may have been partly owing to the influence of this association that the next year, when Mr. Forsyth again brought forward his bill, April 26, 1876, although the numbers of our friends and supporters remained undiminished, the opponents had considerably increased. This was due, also, no doubt, in great degree to the unexpected attitude taken on this question by the Right Hon. John Bright, the most powerful living advocate for freedom and representative government. In Mr. Mill's division of 1867, Mr. Bright had voted in favor of the measure, and while his brother had charge of the bill, he had never opposed it. His opposition speech in this debate, therefore, caused extreme disappointment and discouragement. It had little of the force which had always characterized his pleas for political justice. The most eloquent voice in the House of Commons lost its magic power when no longer inspired by truth. The women in the gallery listened with sorrowful hearts. Though they knew Mr. Bright's opinion could not block the wheels of progress, yet they felt intense regret that so honored a friend to freedom should abandon his most cherished principles when applied to women. The parliamentary history of the next few ye
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   1343   1344  
1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352   1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bright

 

question

 

parliament

 

Forsyth

 

speech

 

association

 

friends

 

opponents

 

increased

 

progress


freedom

 

influence

 

Commons

 

government

 

measure

 

division

 

applied

 

advocate

 
history
 

representative


abandon

 
charge
 

brother

 

living

 

parliamentary

 

principles

 

considerably

 

supporters

 

remained

 
undiminished

degree
 

unexpected

 

numbers

 

cherished

 
attitude
 
powerful
 
eloquent
 

wheels

 
political
 

justice


opinion

 

gallery

 

listened

 

sorrowful

 

hearts

 

inspired

 

longer

 

debate

 

caused

 

honored