FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  
of the women of the country will be surprised to learn that they "have no centennial to celebrate," and will be still more surprised when they discover that it is "inconsistent" for them to unite with their brothers, fathers, sons and husbands "in the celebration of the liberty which is the heritage" of _all_ the people. We cannot but feel that the claims set forth by the association would command more respectful consideration with the display of a different spirit. The maids and matrons of 1776 were of a different mold.--_Commercial._ The _Blade_ has been a good friend to woman suffrage for many years, but we feel that the present article was written in a spirit of needless irritability, such as we should think might ensue from a fit of indigestion. The _Commercial_, since its change of management, has certainly not been unfriendly, and we have thought fair. Its present comments are unjust. The following editorial appeared in _The Ballot-Box_ of the same date: WHY WE CANNOT CELEBRATE THE CENTENNIAL.--The city dailies criticise the suffrage association somewhat severely for declining to unite in the centennial celebration. Perhaps from the outlook of masculine satisfaction it may seem astonishing that patriotism should not inspire us with gratitude for the crumbs from the national table; that we should not rejoice at the great banquet being prepared. But it is as impossible for us to look from their standpoint, as for them to see from ours. While appreciating the kindnesses measured out to us in this city by our friends and the press, yet laboring without visible results for the recognition of our rights as citizens of the United States, we cannot, even through the potent incentive of sympathizing with our "husbands, fathers, brothers and sons," lay aside our grievances and rejoice in a triumph which more clearly marks our own humiliation. Can our friends inform us what is our crime, that we are denied the right of representation? Can they point to any mental or moral deficiency, to render justifiable our being denied political rights? If not--if there is no just cause for our disfranc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
rights
 

denied

 

association

 

spirit

 

suffrage

 

Commercial

 

friends

 
present
 

surprised

 
fathers

brothers

 

husbands

 

centennial

 

rejoice

 

celebration

 
patriotism
 

visible

 
astonishing
 

measured

 

laboring


impossible

 
prepared
 

banquet

 

standpoint

 

appreciating

 

gratitude

 

inspire

 
crumbs
 

national

 

kindnesses


mental
 

representation

 
deficiency
 

render

 

disfranc

 

justifiable

 

political

 

inform

 

potent

 

incentive


States

 

recognition

 

citizens

 
United
 
sympathizing
 

humiliation

 
triumph
 

grievances

 

results

 

comments