FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760  
761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   >>   >|  
rees, but a subordinate arrangement with "diploma examinations, so far and so fast as the resources of the college shall allow." As soon as the subject became known, the newspapers of the city took up the question. As the public furnishes the means and the students for every college, the public were vitally interested. Ministers preached about it, and they, with doctors and lawyers, wrote strong articles, showing that no "annex" was desired; that parents wished thorough, high, self-reliant education for their daughters as for their sons; that health was not injured by the embarrassment (?) of reciting before young men; that young men had not been deterred from going to Ann Arbor, Oberlin, Cornell, and other institutions where there are young women; that it was unjust to make girls go hundreds of miles away to Vassar or Smith or Wellesley, when boys were provided with the best education at their very doors; that, with over half the colleges of this country admitting women, with the colleges of Italy, Switzerland, Sweden, Holland and France throwing open their doors to women, for Adelbert College to shut them out, would be a step backward in civilization. The women of the city took up the matter, and several thousands of our best names were obtained to a petition, asking that girls be retained members of the college; judges and leading persons gladly signed. The trustees met November 7, 1884. The whole city eagerly waited the result. The chairman of the committee, Hon. I. W. Chamberlain of Columbus, who had been opposed to coeducation at first, from the favorable reports received by him from colleges all over the country, had become a thorough convert, and the report was able and convincing. President Angell of Michigan University, where there are 1,500 students, wrote: "Women were admitted here under the pressure of public sentiment against the wishes of most of the professors. But I think no professor now regrets it, or would favor the exclusion of women. We made no solitary modification of our rules or requirements. The women did not become hoydenish; they did not fail in their studies; they did not break down in health; they have been graduated in all departments; they have not been inferior in scholarship to the men. We count the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760  
761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
college
 

public

 

colleges

 

health

 

country

 

education

 

students

 
coeducation
 

opposed

 
Chamberlain

Columbus

 

received

 

convert

 

report

 

arrangement

 
diploma
 

reports

 
examinations
 

favorable

 

committee


leading

 
persons
 

gladly

 

signed

 

judges

 

members

 

petition

 
retained
 

trustees

 

waited


result
 

chairman

 
convincing
 

eagerly

 

November

 

Michigan

 

requirements

 

hoydenish

 

modification

 

solitary


exclusion

 

subordinate

 

studies

 
inferior
 
scholarship
 

departments

 
graduated
 

regrets

 

admitted

 

Angell