FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>  
Recht und Rechtsverfahren_, i. p. 358.--The definition in Aristotle, _de virt. et vit._ 7, p. 1251_a_, has, I think, no legal foundation. P. 9. On the legal foundation for the trials of Christians, see Mommsen, _Der Religionsfreuel nach roemischem Recht_ (_Ges. Schr._ iii. p. 389).--Mommsen goes too far, I think, in supposing a legal foundation for the trials of Christians; above all, I do not believe that the defection from the Roman religion was ever considered as maiestas in the technical sense of the word, the more so as it is certain that, after the earliest period, no difference was made in the treatment of citizens and aliens. P. 13. Lists of atheists: Cicero, _de nat. deor._ 1. 1, 2 (comp. 1. 23, 26). Sext. Emp. _hypotyp._ 3. 213; _adv. math._ 9. 50. Aelian, _v.h._ 2. 31; _de nat. an._ 6. 40.--The predicate _atheos_ is once applied to Anaxagoras by a Christian author (Irenaeus: see Diels, _Vorsokr._ 46, A 113; compare also Marcellinus, _vit. Thuc._, see below, note on p. 29). Of such isolated cases I have taken no account. P. 16. On the dualism in the Greek conception of the nature of gods see Naegelsbach, _Hom. Theol._ p. 11.--Pindar: _Ol._ 1. 28, 9. 35; _Pyth._ 3. 27. P. 17. Xenophanes: Einhorn, _Zeit- und Streitfragen der modernen Xenophanesforschung_ (_Arch. f. Gesch. d. Philos._ xxxi.). P. 18. Xenophanes's age: Diels, _Vorsokr._ 11, B 8.--His criticism of Homer and Hesiod: _ibid._ 11, 12.--Titans and Giants: _ibid._ 1. 22.--Criticism of Anthropomorphism: _ibid._ 14-16.--Divination: Cic. _de div._ 1. 3, 5. P. 19. On Xenophanes's conception of God, comp. _Vorsokr._ 11, B 23-26; on the identification of God with the universe: _Vorsokr._ 11, A 30, 31, 33-36.--Cicero: _de div._ 1. 3, 5. P. 21. For Xenophanes's theology, comp. Freudenthal, _Arch. f. Gesch. d. Philos._ i. p. 322, and Zeller's criticism, _ibid._ p. 524. Agreeing with Freudenthal: Decharme, p. 46; Campbell, _Religion in Greek Literature_, p. 293. P. 21. Parmenides does not even appear to have designated his "Being" as God (Zeller, i. p. 563). P. 23. In the eighteenth century people discussed diffusely the question whether Thales was an atheist (of course in the sense in which the word was taken at that time); comp. Tennemann, _Gesch. d. Philos._ i. pp. 62 and 422. Tennemann remarks quite truly that the question is put wrongly. P. 24. Thales: Diels, _Vorsokr._ 1, A 22-23.--Attitude of Democritus towards popular belief: _Vorsokr.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>  



Top keywords:

Vorsokr

 

Xenophanes

 

Philos

 
foundation
 
Zeller
 

criticism

 

Cicero

 

trials

 
Christians
 

Tennemann


Thales
 

question

 

Mommsen

 

Freudenthal

 

conception

 

Divination

 

modernen

 

Xenophanesforschung

 
Streitfragen
 

Einhorn


Titans

 

Giants

 

Criticism

 

Hesiod

 

Anthropomorphism

 

Decharme

 

atheist

 

people

 

discussed

 

diffusely


remarks

 

Democritus

 
popular
 

belief

 

Attitude

 

wrongly

 

century

 
eighteenth
 
Agreeing
 

Campbell


theology

 
universe
 

Religion

 

Literature

 
designated
 
Parmenides
 

identification

 

considered

 

maiestas

 

technical