FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340  
341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   >>  
ously declared that "the Lord hath not forsaken them that seek Him," and that "He hath not said to the seed of Jacob, Seek ye my face in vain"? Which is entitled to the greater weight, the testimony of Mr. Holyoake, or that of the Psalmist, "I waited patiently for the Lord, and He inclined unto me, and heard my cry;" or that of the prophet, "I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the Lord, and He heard me: out of the belly of hell cried I, and thou heardest my voice: When my soul fainted within me I remembered the Lord, and my prayer came in unto Thee into thine holy temple;" or that of the apostle, "For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me; and He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness"?[303] A cry for help may not be "the prayer of faith," but the utterance of an unsubdued and rebellious will, and can afford no test, therefore, of the truth of the doctrine of Scripture. But "Science," says Mr. Holyoake, "is the providence of life, and spiritual dependence may be attended with material destruction." He would substitute, therefore, the Science of man for the Providence of God, and secular _diligence_ for spiritual _dependence_. But is there no room for both? Are they necessarily incompatible or mutually exclusive? Why should the Science of man be opposed to the Providence of God, or secular industry to religious faith? All Christians combine the two; why should Mr. Holyoake seek to divorce them? What is Science? It is "the well-devised method of using Nature; it is in this that Science is the providence of man. It is not pretended that Science is a perfect dependence; on the contrary, it is admitted to be narrow and but partially developed; but it is the only special dependence that man has."[304] And is the _wise use of Nature_ inconsistent with Religion? is it the exclusive monopoly of Atheism? Or is spiritual dependence necessarily incompatible with industrial pursuits? Who have been the most scientific and the most industrious members of the community, the small band of Atheists, or the great body of Christians? To the latter belong all the advantages which Science, or the wise use of Nature, can secure, while they have _besides_ a Providence, distinct from Nature and superior to it, whose wakeful eye never slumbers, and whose ear is ever open to their cry. 5. Secularism seeks to supersede Religion, and to substitute _morality_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340  
341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   >>  



Top keywords:
Science
 

dependence

 

Nature

 

Holyoake

 

Providence

 

spiritual

 
prayer
 
perfect
 

incompatible

 
Religion

necessarily

 

exclusive

 
Christians
 

substitute

 

secular

 

providence

 

industry

 

divorce

 
narrow
 
admitted

contrary

 

opposed

 
religious
 
combine
 

method

 

partially

 

pretended

 
devised
 

distinct

 

superior


wakeful

 

secure

 

belong

 

advantages

 
Secularism
 

supersede

 
morality
 

slumbers

 
monopoly
 

Atheism


industrial

 

inconsistent

 

special

 
pursuits
 

mutually

 

Atheists

 

community

 

scientific

 

industrious

 
members