iking and dramatic picture of a lonely and extraordinary man
espousing an apparently hopeless cause, deliberately selecting fear as
the weapon of his warfare, and actually leading his little band of
astonished followers within sight of victory.

It is ridiculous to say that fear possesses no moral value. Whenever I
hear that contention stated, my mind invariably swings back to a great
story told by Sir Henry Hawkins in his _Reminiscences_. He is telling
of his experiences under Mr. Justice Maule, and is praising the
judicial perspicacity of that judge. In a certain murder case a boy of
eight was called to give evidence, and counsel objected to so youthful
a witness being heard. Mr. Justice Maule thought for a minute, and
then beckoned the boy to the bench.

'"I should like to know," His Honour observed, "what you have been
taught to believe. What will become of you, my little boy, when you
die, if you are so wicked as to tell a lie?"'

'"Hell-fire!" answered the boy with great promptitude.

'"But do you mean to say," the judge went on, "that you would go to
hell-fire for telling any lie?"

'"Hell-fire, sir!" the boy replied again.

'To several similar questions the boy made the same terrible response.

'"He does not seem to be competent," said the counsel.

'"I beg your pardon," returned the judge. "This boy thinks that for
every wilful fault he will go to hell-fire; and he is very likely while
he believes that doctrine to be most strict in his observance of truth.
If you and I believed that such would be the penalty for every act of
misconduct we committed, we should be better men than we are. Let the
boy be sworn!"'

Sir Henry Hawkins tells the story with evident approval, so that we
have here the valuable testimony of two distinguished judges to the
moral value of fear from a purely judicial point of view. Of course,
the value is not stable or permanent. The goodness that arises from
fear is like the tameness of a terrified tiger, or the willingness of a
wolf to leave the deer unharmed when both are flying from before a
prairie-fire. When the fear passes, the blood-lust will return. But
that is not the point. Nobody said that fear was wisdom. What the
wise man said was that fear is _the beginning_ of wisdom. And as the
beginning of wisdom it has a certain initial and preparatory value.
The sooner that the beginning is developed and brought to a climax, the
better of course it will be. But mea