FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   1554   1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562  
1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   >>   >|  
sons; thus a teacher is said to have an office, and so is a judge, and so forth. Wherefore Isidore says (Etym. vi, 19) that "to have an office is to be officious," i.e. harmful "to no one, but to be useful to all." Reply Obj. 3: Differences of state, offices and grades are taken from different things, as stated above (A. 1, ad 3). Yet these three things may concur in the same subject: thus when a person is appointed to a higher action, he attains thereby both office and grade, and sometimes, besides this, a state of perfection, on account of the sublimity of the act, as in the case of a bishop. The ecclesiastical orders are particularly distinct according to divine offices. For Isidore says (Etym. vi): "There are various kinds of offices; but the foremost is that which relates to sacred and Divine things." _______________________ FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 183, Art. 4] Whether the Difference of States Applies to Those Who Are Beginning, Progressing, or Perfect? Objection 1: It would seem that the difference of states does not apply to those who are beginning, progressing, or perfect. For "diverse genera have diverse species and differences" [*Aristotle, Categ. ii]. Now this difference of beginning, progress, and perfection is applied to the degrees of charity, as stated above (Q. 24, A. 9), where we were treating of charity. Therefore it would seem that the differences of states should not be assigned in this manner. Obj. 2: Further, as stated above (A. 1), state regards a condition of servitude or freedom, which apparently has no connection with the aforesaid difference of beginning, progress, and perfection. Therefore it is unfitting to divide state in this way. Obj. 3: Further, the distinction of beginning, progress, and perfection seems to refer to _more_ and _less,_ and this seemingly implies the notion of grades. But the distinction of grades differs from that of states, as we have said above (AA. 2, 3). Therefore state is unfittingly divided according to beginning, progress, and perfection. _On the contrary,_ Gregory says (Moral. xxiv, 11): "There are three states of the converted, the beginning, the middle, and the perfection"; and (Hom. xv in Ezech.): "Other is the beginning of virtue, other its progress, and other still its perfection." _I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1) state regards freedom or servitude. Now in spiritual things there is a twofold servitude and a twofold freedom: for t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   1554   1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562  
1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

perfection

 
beginning
 

progress

 
states
 
stated
 

things

 
servitude
 

offices

 

grades

 

freedom


Therefore

 
office
 

difference

 

Further

 

distinction

 

charity

 

diverse

 

differences

 
Isidore
 
twofold

manner

 
condition
 

assigned

 

Aristotle

 

species

 
genera
 

perfect

 

applied

 
degrees
 

treating


middle
 
converted
 

Gregory

 
virtue
 
spiritual
 

answer

 

contrary

 

divide

 

unfitting

 

aforesaid


connection

 

progressing

 

unfittingly

 

divided

 
differs
 

seemingly

 

implies

 

notion

 

apparently

 

person