FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   1588   1589   1590   1591  
1592   1593   1594   1595   1596   1597   1598   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   1605   1606   1607   1608   1609   1610   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   >>   >|  
x. 4:12): "I will be in thy mouth, and I will teach thee what thou shalt speak." At other times the impediment cannot be removed, neither by the person appointing nor by the one appointed--for instance, if an archbishop be unable to dispense from an irregularity; wherefore a subject, if irregular, would not be bound to obey him by accepting the episcopate or even sacred orders. Reply Obj. 3: It is not in itself necessary for salvation to accept the episcopal office, but it becomes necessary by reason of the superior's command. Now one may lawfully place an obstacle to things thus necessary for salvation, before the command is given; else it would not be lawful to marry a second time, lest one should thus incur an impediment to the episcopate or holy orders. But this would not be lawful in things necessary for salvation. Hence the Blessed Mark did not act against a precept by cutting off his finger, although it is credible that he did this by the instigation of the Holy Ghost, without which it would be unlawful for anyone to lay hands on himself. If a man take a vow not to accept the bishop's office, and by this intend to bind himself not even to accept it in obedience to his superior prelate, his vow is unlawful; but if he intend to bind himself, so far as it lies with him, not to seek the episcopal office, nor to accept it except under urgent necessity, his vow is lawful, because he vows to do what it becomes a man to do. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 185, Art. 3] Whether He That Is Appointed to the Episcopate Ought to Be Better Than Others? Objection 1: It would seem that one who is appointed to the episcopate ought to be better than others. For our Lord, when about to commit the pastoral office to Peter, asked him if he loved Him more than the others. Now a man is the better through loving God the more. Therefore it would seem that one ought not to be appointed to the episcopal office except he be better than others. Obj. 2: Further, Pope Symmachus says (can. Vilissimus I, qu. 1): "A man is of very little worth who though excelling in dignity, excels not in knowledge and holiness." Now he who excels in knowledge and holiness is better. Therefore a man ought not to be appointed to the episcopate unless he be better than others. Obj. 3: Further, in every genus the lesser are governed by the greater, as corporeal things are governed by things spiritual, and the lower bodies by the higher
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   1588   1589   1590   1591  
1592   1593   1594   1595   1596   1597   1598   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   1605   1606   1607   1608   1609   1610   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

office

 
accept
 

things

 

episcopate

 

appointed

 

salvation

 

lawful

 

episcopal

 

governed

 
holiness

unlawful

 

command

 

superior

 

excels

 

Further

 
impediment
 

knowledge

 
orders
 

intend

 

Therefore


Appointed
 
bodies
 
Episcopate
 

Better

 

lesser

 

necessity

 

urgent

 

higher

 

ARTICLE

 

Whether


Others
 

loving

 

greater

 
corporeal
 

Symmachus

 

spiritual

 

Vilissimus

 

dignity

 
excelling
 
commit

pastoral
 

Objection

 
subject
 

irregular

 

wherefore

 

irregularity

 

unable

 

dispense

 

accepting

 

lawfully