FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
l more true of any attempt that may be made at federation between Great Britain and Ireland. No corrections which could be made in the Gladstonian or any other constitution would make it work exactly on the lines laid down by its framers. Even if it were revised in accordance with Mr. Dicey's criticism, it would probably be found, as in the case of the American Constitution, that few of the dangers which were most feared for it had beset it, and that some of the inconveniences which were most distinctly foreseen as likely to arise from it were among the things which had materially contributed to its success. History is full of the gentle ridicule which the course of events throws on statesmen and philosophers. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 24: Printed in the earlier part of this volume.] [Footnote 25: Essay on the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences.] THE "UNIONIST" CASE FOR HOME RULE. BY R. BARRY O'BRIEN. I am often asked, What are the best books to read on the Irish question? and I never fail to mention Mr. Lecky's _Leaders of Public Opinion in Ireland_ and the _History of England in the Eighteenth Century_; Mr. Goldwin Smith's _Irish History and Irish Character, Three English Statesmen, The Irish Question_, and Professor Dicey's admirable work, _England's Case against Home Rule_. Indeed, the case for Home Rule, as stated in these books, is unanswerable; and it redounds to the credit of Mr. Lecky, Mr. Goldwin Smith, and Mr. Dicey that their narrative of facts should in no wise be prejudiced by their political opinions. That their facts are upon one side and their opinions on the other is a minor matter. Their facts, I venture to assert, have made more Home Rulers than their opinions can unmake. To put this assertion to the test I propose to quote some extracts from the works above mentioned. These extracts shall be full and fair. Nothing shall be left out that can in the slightest degree qualify any statement of fact in the context. Arguments will be omitted, for I wish to place facts mainly before my readers. From these facts they can draw their own conclusions. Neither shall I take up space with comments of my own. I shall call my witnesses and let them speak for themselves. I.--MR. LECKY. In the introduction to the new edition of the _Leaders of Public Opinion in Ireland_, published in 1871--seventy-one years after Mr. Pitt's Union, which was to make England and Ireland one nation--we
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ireland

 

History

 
opinions
 

England

 
Goldwin
 

extracts

 

Opinion

 

Public

 

Footnote

 

Leaders


assertion

 
redounds
 

unmake

 

credit

 
propose
 
Nothing
 
mentioned
 

attempt

 

Rulers

 
federation

prejudiced
 

political

 

matter

 

narrative

 
assert
 
venture
 

qualify

 

introduction

 

witnesses

 

edition


nation
 

published

 

seventy

 

comments

 

omitted

 

Arguments

 

context

 

degree

 

unanswerable

 
statement

conclusions

 
Neither
 
readers
 

slightest

 

statesmen

 
philosophers
 

FOOTNOTES

 
throws
 

events

 
framers