FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>  
ds below the original level of the water can be properly said to be immersed, and only an equal bulk of water is displaced." Hence, according to HECLA, a solid, whose weight was equal to that of an equal bulk of water, would not float till the whole of it was below "the original level" of the water: but, as a matter of fact, it would float as soon as it was all under water. MAGPIE says the fallacy is "the assumption that one body can displace another from a place where it isn't," and that Lardner's assertion is incorrect, except when the containing vessel "was originally full to the brim." But the question of floating depends on the present state of things, not on past history. OLD KING COLE takes the same view as HECLA. TYMPANUM and VINDEX assume that "displaced" means "raised above its original level," and merely explain how it comes to pass that the water, so raised, is less in bulk than the immersed portion of bucket, and thus land themselves--or rather set themselves floating--in the same boat as HECLA. I regret that there is no Class-list to publish for this Problem. * * * * * Sec. 2. BALBUS' ESSAY. _Problem._--Balbus states that if a certain solid be immersed in a certain vessel of water, the water will rise through a series of distances, two inches, one inch, half an inch, &c., which series has no end. He concludes that the water will rise without limit. Is this true? _Solution._--No. This series can never reach 4 inches, since, however many terms we take, we are always short of 4 inches by an amount equal to the last term taken. * * * * * Three answers have been received--but only two seem to me worthy of honours. TYMPANUM says that the statement about the stick "is merely a blind, to which the old answer may well be applied, _solvitur ambulando_, or rather _mergendo_." I trust TYMPANUM will not test this in his own person, by taking the place of the man in Balbus' Essay! He would infallibly be drowned. OLD KING COLE rightly points out that the series, 2, 1, &c., is a decreasing Geometrical Progression: while VINDEX rightly identifies the fallacy as that of "Achilles and the Tortoise." CLASS LIST. I. OLD KING COLE. VINDEX. * * * * * Sec. 3. THE GARDEN. _Problem._--An oblong garden, half a yard longer than wide, consists entirely of a gravel-walk, spirally arranged, a yard
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>  



Top keywords:

series

 

original

 
Problem
 
TYMPANUM
 

VINDEX

 

inches

 
immersed
 

raised

 

floating

 
vessel

rightly
 

Balbus

 

fallacy

 

displaced

 

received

 

answers

 

worthy

 

answer

 

honours

 

statement


spirally

 
arranged
 
gravel
 

properly

 

amount

 
consists
 

Progression

 

identifies

 

Geometrical

 
decreasing

Achilles
 
Tortoise
 

GARDEN

 
oblong
 

points

 

longer

 
ambulando
 

mergendo

 

solvitur

 

applied


infallibly

 

drowned

 
taking
 

person

 

garden

 

assume

 

explain

 
displace
 

portion

 

question