FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>  
tee_, either upon _interrogatories_ agreed upon in the House, or such as the committee in their discretion shall demand. Thus it was in ancient times, as shall appear by the precedents, so many as they are, they being very sparing to record those ceremonies, which I shall briefly recite: I then add those of later times." Accordingly, in times so late as those of the trial of Lord Middlesex,[74] upon an impeachment of the Commons, the whole course of the proceeding, especially in the mode of adducing the evidence, was in a manner the same as in the Civil Law: depositions were taken, and publication regularly passed: and on the trial of Lord Strafford, both modes pointed out by Selden seem to have been indifferently used. It follows, therefore, that this high court (bound by none of their rules) has a liberty to adopt the methods of any of the legal courts of the kingdom at its discretion; and in _sound_ discretion it ought to adopt those which bear the nearest resemblance to its own constitution, to its own procedure, and to its exigencies in the promotion of justice. There are conveniencies and inconveniencies both in the shorter and the longer mode of trial. But to bring the methods observed (if such are in fact observed) in the former, only from necessity, into the latter, by choice, is to load it with the inconveniency of both, without the advantages of either. The chief benefit of any process which admits of adjournments is, that it may afford means of fuller information and more mature deliberation. If neither of the parties have a strict right to it, yet the court or the jury, as the case may be, ought to demand it. Your Committee is of opinion, that all rules relative to laches or neglects in a party to the suit, which may cause nonsuit on the one hand or judgment by default in the other, all things which cause the party _cadere in jure_, ought not to be adhered to in the utmost rigor, even in civil cases; but still less ought that spirit which takes advantage of lapses and failures on either part to be suffered to govern in causes criminal. "Judges ought to _lean_ against every attempt to nonsuit a plaintiff on objections which have no relation to the real merits. It is unconscionable in a defendant to take advantage of the _apices litigandi_: against such objections _every possible presumption ought to be made which ingenuity can suggest_. How disgraceful would it be to the administration of justice to all
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>  



Top keywords:

discretion

 

methods

 

justice

 
objections
 
demand
 

observed

 
nonsuit
 

advantage

 

relative

 

laches


neglects
 

opinion

 

Committee

 

admits

 

adjournments

 
afford
 

process

 

benefit

 

advantages

 
fuller

information

 
strict
 

parties

 

mature

 

deliberation

 

merits

 

unconscionable

 
defendant
 

relation

 

Judges


attempt

 

plaintiff

 

apices

 

litigandi

 

disgraceful

 

administration

 

suggest

 

presumption

 

ingenuity

 

criminal


adhered

 

utmost

 

cadere

 

judgment

 

default

 

things

 
failures
 

suffered

 

govern

 

lapses