FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>  
e according to the course of practice and common justice, before the Judges in their several courts, for the prosecutors in behalf of the King, _during the time of trial, to produce witnesses to discover the truth_, and whether the prisoner may not do the like?' The Lord Chief-Justice delivered this as the unanimous opinions of himself and all the rest of the Judges: 'That, according to the course of practice and common justice, before them in their several courts, upon trial by jury, _as long as the prisoner is at the bar, and the jury not sent away_, either side may give their evidence and examine witnesses to discover truth; and this is all the opinion as we can give concerning the proceedings before us.' Upon, some consideration after this, the House appointed the Earl of Bath, Earl of South'ton, Earl of Hartford, Earl of Essex, Earl of Bristol, and the Lord Viscount Say et Seale to draw up some reasons upon which the former order was made, which, being read as followeth, were approved of, as the order of the House: 'The gentlemen of the House of Commons did declare, that they challenge to themselves, by the common justice of the kingdom, that they, being prosecutors for the King, may bring any new proofs by witnesses during the time of the evidence being not fully concluded. The Lords, being judges, and so equal to them and the prisoner, conceived this their desire to be just and reasonable; and also that, by the same common justice, the prisoner may use the same liberty; and that, to avoid any occasions of delay, the Lords thought fit that the articles and witnesses be presently named, and such as may be presently produced to be used presently, [and such as cannot to be used on Monday,] and no further time to be given.' The Lord Steward was to let them know, that, if they will on both sides waive the use of new witnesses, they may proceed to the recollection of their evidence on both sides; if both sides will not waive it, then the Lord Steward is to read the precedent order; and if they will not proceed then, this House is to adjourn and rise."[79] By this it will appear to the House how much this exclusion of evidence, _brought for the discovery of truth_, is unsupported either by Parliamentary precedent or by the rule as understood in the Common Law courts below; and your Committee (protesting, however, against being bound by any of the technical rules of inferior courts) thought, and think, they had a right t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>  



Top keywords:

witnesses

 

courts

 

justice

 
evidence
 
common
 

prisoner

 
presently
 

practice

 

proceed

 

precedent


Steward
 

thought

 

discover

 

prosecutors

 

Judges

 
produce
 

behalf

 

recollection

 

delivered

 
articles

occasions

 
Justice
 

produced

 

Monday

 

protesting

 

Committee

 

technical

 
inferior
 

Common

 

exclusion


brought

 

understood

 

Parliamentary

 

discovery

 

unsupported

 

adjourn

 

opinions

 

Viscount

 

Bristol

 

Hartford


reasons

 

proceedings

 

examine

 

opinion

 

appointed

 

consideration

 
judges
 

concluded

 

conceived

 

desire