FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255  
256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   >>   >|  
velopment_, p. 357. [85] It is by no means to be assumed that "spiritual" and "corporeal" are exact equivalents of "immaterial" and "material" in the minds of ancient speculators on these topics. The "spiritual body" of the risen dead (1 Cor. xv.) is not the "natural" "flesh and blood" body. Paul does not teach the resurrection of the body in the ordinary sense of the word "body"; a fact, often overlooked, but pregnant with many consequences. [86] Tertullian (_Apolog. Adv. Gentes_, cap. xxiii) thus challenges the Roman authorities: let them bring a possessed person into the presence of a Christian before their tribunal, and if the demon does not confess himself to be such, on the order of the Christian, let the Christian be executed out of hand. [87] See the expression of orthodox opinion upon the "accommodation" subterfuge already cited above, p. 217. [88] I quote the first edition (1843). A second edition appeared in 1870. Tract 85 of the _Tracts for the Times_ should be read with this _Essay_. If I were called upon to compile a Primer of "Infidelity," I think I should save myself trouble by making a selection from these works, and from the _Essay on Development_ by the same author. [89] Yet, when it suits his purpose, as in the Introduction to the _Essay on Development_, Dr. Newman can demand strict evidence in religious questions as sharply as any "infidel author;" and he can even profess to yield to its force (_Essay on Miracles_, 1870; note, p. 391). [90] Compare Tract 85, p. 110; "I am persuaded that were men but consistent who oppose the Church doctrines as being unscriptural, they would vindicate the Jews for rejecting the Gospel." [91] According to Dr. Newman, "This prayer [that of Bishop Alexander, who begged God to 'take Arius away'] is said to have been offered about 3 P.M. on the Saturday; that same evening Arius was in the great square of Constantine, when he was suddenly seized with indisposition" (p. clxx). The "infidel" Gibbon seems to have dared to suggest that "an option between poison and miracle" is presented by this case;
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255  
256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christian

 
edition
 

infidel

 

Newman

 

Development

 

author

 

spiritual

 

unscriptural

 
Miracles
 
Compare

oppose

 

Church

 
consistent
 

profess

 

persuaded

 
doctrines
 

assumed

 

purpose

 

Introduction

 
equivalents

corporeal

 

demand

 
sharply
 

questions

 

strict

 

evidence

 

religious

 

vindicate

 
suddenly
 
seized

indisposition

 

Constantine

 

square

 

Saturday

 

evening

 

velopment

 

Gibbon

 

poison

 

miracle

 

presented


option

 

suggest

 

prayer

 
Bishop
 

Alexander

 

According

 
rejecting
 
Gospel
 

begged

 

offered