FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   >>  
ich he is entangled. I content myself with assuring those who, with my paper (not Mr. Gladstone's version of my arguments) in hand, consult the original authorities, that they will find full justification for every statement I have made. But in order to dispose those who cannot, or will not, take that trouble, to believe that the proverbial blindness of one that judges his own cause plays no part in inducing me to speak thus decidedly, I beg their attention to the following examination, which shall be as brief as I can make it, of the seven propositions in which Mr. Gladstone professes to give a faithful summary of my "errors." When, in the middle of the seventeenth century, the Holy See declared that certain propositions contained in the work of Bishop Jansen were heretical, the Jansenists of Port Royal replied that, while they were ready to defer to the Papal authority about questions of faith and morals, they must be permitted to judge about questions of fact for themselves; and that, really, the condemned propositions were not to be found in Jansen's writings. As everybody knows, His Holiness and the Grand Monarque replied to this, surely not unreasonable, plea after the manner of Lord Peter in the "Tale of a Tub." It is, therefore, not without some apprehension of meeting with a similar fate, that I put in a like plea against Mr. Gladstone's Bull. The seven propositions declared to be false and condemnable, in that kindly and gentle way which so pleasantly compares with the authoritative style of the Vatican (No. 5 more particularly), may or may not be true. But they are not to be found in anything I have written. And some of them diametrically contravene that which I have written. I proceed to prove my assertions. PROP. 1. _Throughout the paper he confounds together what I had distinguished, namely, the city of Gadara and the vicinage attached to it, not as a mere pomoerium, but as a rural district_. In my judgment, this statement is devoid of foundation. In my paper on "The Keepers of the Herd of Swine" I point out, at some length, that, "in accordance with the ancient Hellenic practice," each city of the Decapolis must have been "surrounded by a certain amount of territory amenable to its jurisdiction": and, to enforce this conclusion, I quote what Josephus says about the "villages that belonged to Gadara and Hippos." As I understand the term _pomerium_ or _pomoerium_,[113] it means the space which, accord
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   >>  



Top keywords:

propositions

 
Gladstone
 

Gadara

 

pomoerium

 

questions

 

written

 

replied

 

declared

 
Jansen
 
statement

accord

 

Hippos

 
belonged
 

diametrically

 

contravene

 
proceed
 

villages

 

pomerium

 

apprehension

 
meeting

similar

 

condemnable

 
understand
 

authoritative

 

compares

 

pleasantly

 

kindly

 

gentle

 
Vatican
 
assertions

devoid

 

foundation

 

Keepers

 

judgment

 

surrounded

 

district

 

ancient

 

Hellenic

 

practice

 

accordance


length

 

amount

 

Throughout

 
confounds
 

conclusion

 

Decapolis

 
distinguished
 
amenable
 

territory

 

attached