FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>  
f right and justice and the desire to promote the public welfare grow, individualism grows also. Each individual, thrown upon his own resources, learns to think and question and judge. In democratic states he learns to take upon himself the responsibility for his acts, and at length the view becomes prevalent that law exists for the benefit of society. The individual, in judging himself and his attitude toward society, feels that the law must be obeyed because obedience promotes the public welfare. Even when he believes that a law is unwise, or even unjust, he hesitates to violate it, not only because he might be punished therefor, but primarily because it has become wrong, according to his conscience, to violate a law that has been adopted by the representatives of his fellow citizens as just and beneficial. Thus the individual, in later even more than in earlier times, obeys the laws not merely from selfish, but from social and religious motives. _Questions for Further Consideration_. Can you name any modern laws that you think have been framed in the interests of a special social class? Do you think that the people of to-day are recreant in their respect for or adherence to law? What do you consider to be the value of such institutions as those at West Point and Annapolis in their influence on the enforcement of law and discipline? When we speak of "Government of the people, by the people, and for the people," whom exactly do we mean by "people"? Does the word have the same meaning in each of these phrases? Is it ever right to violate a law of the land? Some people contend that an individual ought to break a human law, provided that it is contrary to divine law. What is divine law? Who decides? Shall the individual decide, or is that the duty of the community? Or of the clergy? Was it right for the Abolitionists to violate the provisions of the fugitive slave law? Were this handful of men, able and conscientious as they were, as likely to be right regarding the welfare of society as the large majority of citizens whose representatives had enacted the fugitive slave law? If a person believes our tariff laws to be unjust, is it right for him to smuggle goods? Under what circumstances, if any, is it one's duty to disobey a law of the state? Would the fact that an individual believed it his duty to violate the law justify a judge in declining to punish him? Thoreau declined to pay a tax t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>  



Top keywords:
people
 

individual

 
violate
 

society

 
welfare
 

believes

 

divine

 
unjust
 

representatives

 

citizens


learns
 

social

 

public

 

fugitive

 

decides

 
decide
 

community

 
provided
 
contrary
 

Government


influence

 

enforcement

 

discipline

 

contend

 

meaning

 

phrases

 

disobey

 

circumstances

 

smuggle

 

declined


Thoreau
 

punish

 

believed

 
justify
 

declining

 

tariff

 

handful

 

conscientious

 
Annapolis
 
Abolitionists

provisions

 

enacted

 
person
 

majority

 

clergy

 

obeyed

 

obedience

 

promotes

 

attitude

 

unwise