FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   >>  
omit [Greek: chai tetrachosiois], making the number of years 1061. The usual figuring, 1461, has pertinence: the number is just four times 365-1/4 and was recognized as an Egyptian year-cycle. As to the facts, however, Sturz points out (note 139 to Book 43) that after the elapse of fourteen hundred and sixty-one years eleven days must be subtracted instead of one day added. Pope Gregory XIII ascertained this when in A.D. 1582 he summoned Aloysius and Antonius Lilius to advise him in regard to the calendar. (Boissee also refers here to Ideler, _Manuel de Chronologie_, II, 119ff.)] [Footnote 95: The name of these islands is spelled both _Gymnasioe and Gymnesioe_, and they are also called _Baleares_ and _Pityusoe_. Cp. the end of IX, 10, in the transcript of Zonaras (Volume I).] [Footnote 96: This is of course New Carthage (Karthago Nova), the Spanish colony of the African city.] [Footnote 97: At the close of this chapter there are undoubtedly certain gaps in the MS., as Dindorf discerned. In the Tauchnitz stereotyped edition, which usually insists upon wresting some sense from such passages either by conjecture or by emendation, the following sentence appears: "But Pompey made light of these supernatural effects, and the war shrank to the compass of a battle." Boissevain (with a suggestion by Kuiper) reads: [Greek: all haege gar to daimonion hen te oligoria auto hepoihaesato chai es polin Moundan pros machaen dae chatestae]. This would mean: "But Heaven, which he had slighted, led his steps, and he took up his quarters in a city called Munda preparatory to battle."] [Footnote 98: Mommsen in his Roman History (third German edition, p. 627, note 1), remarks that Dio must have confused the son of Bocchus with the son of Massinissa, Arabio, who certainly did align himself with the Pompeian party (Appian, Civil Wars, IV, 54). All other evidence, outside of this one passage, shows the two kings to have been steadfastly loyal to Caesar, behavior which brought them tangible profit in the shape of enlargement of their domains.] [Footnote 99: I.e., they were in arms against Caesar a second time. Compare the note on chapter 12.] [Footnote 100: This name is spelled _Coesonius_ in Florus's Epitome of Livy's Thirteenth Book (=Florus II, 13, 86) and also in Orosius's Narratives for the Discomfiture of Pagans (VI, 16, 9), but appears with the same form as here in Cicero's Philippics, XII, 9, 23.] [Footnote 101: The MS.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

number

 
edition
 

chapter

 
battle
 

appears

 

Caesar

 

called

 

Florus

 

spelled


preparatory

 
Mommsen
 

confused

 

Bocchus

 
Massinissa
 
Arabio
 
remarks
 

German

 

History

 
daimonion

oligoria
 

hepoihaesato

 

suggestion

 

Boissevain

 
Kuiper
 
slighted
 

Heaven

 

Moundan

 

machaen

 

chatestae


quarters
 

Coesonius

 

Epitome

 

Thirteenth

 

Compare

 

Orosius

 

Cicero

 

Philippics

 

Narratives

 
Discomfiture

Pagans

 
domains
 
compass
 

evidence

 

Appian

 
Pompeian
 

passage

 
tangible
 

profit

 
enlargement