FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  
necessary to a clear understanding of the merits and defects of each one taken singly. Additional light will also be thrown upon them in the course of our analysis of the fourth proposition, which practically touches more vital and important questions than are involved in the others. Contrary to previous announcement, want of space will prevent the examination of this Generalization and of Dr. Draper's work in the present paper. After this article was put in type, the writer received a letter from a friend, a distinguished member of the Positive School, in which occurs the following sentence: 'I notice in your ... article on 'Buckle, Draper, and a Science of History,' one inaccuracy. You say: 'History, while it is the source whence the proof of his (Comte's) fundamental positions is drawn, finds no place in his scientific schedule.' In the positive Hierarchy of Science History _is_ included: it constitutes the Dynamic Branch of Sociology. As in the Science of Life, Anatomy constitutes Biological Statics and Physiology Biological Dynamics, in Sociology we have Social Statics--the Theory of Order, Social Dynamics--the Theory of Progress = the Philosophy (Science) of History.' The kindly criticism of the writer arises from that fruitful source of misunderstanding--a wrong apprehension of terms. History, as it has been hitherto written, has been--_First_, a narration of the supposed facts of the past, without any especial attempt to investigate the proximate causes of national characteristics or mundane progression. _Secondly_, an account of the life and vicissitudes of states and communities, accompanied with an inquiry into the proximate causes of national peculiarities. These two Branches of Investigation have been included under the common appellation of _History_, when they related to a special portion of the globe; and of _General_ or _Universal History_ when, theoretically at least, the whole earth was under consideration. _Thirdly_, the examination of the past progress of the Race, with a view to the discovery of the fundamental Cause or Causes which control or direct the Evolutions of Time, or the Principles in accordance with which nations and civilizations have developed. This Department is denominated _The Philosophy of History_. From it are excluded all those investigations of an individual or national character which comprise _History_ in the ordinary
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

History

 

Science

 

national

 
source
 

Draper

 
fundamental
 

article

 

writer

 
Social
 
proximate

Philosophy

 

Biological

 
constitutes
 
Statics
 
Dynamics
 

Theory

 

examination

 

included

 

Sociology

 
Secondly

communities

 
accompanied
 

states

 

merits

 

understanding

 

vicissitudes

 
account
 
inquiry
 

Investigation

 

common


appellation

 

Branches

 

peculiarities

 

progression

 

defects

 

narration

 

supposed

 
written
 

Additional

 

hitherto


singly
 

characteristics

 
investigate
 
especial
 
attempt
 

mundane

 

civilizations

 
developed
 
Department
 

nations