FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  
n cases, it would be wrong to conclude absolutely that all must have had same origin, but the strongest analogy is in favour of it. And we can by our theory, for during infinite changes some organ, we might have anticipated, would have become useless. <We can> readily explain the fact, so astounding on any other view, namely that organs possibly useless have been formed often with the same exquisite care as when of vital importance. {167} I imagine the meaning to be that abortive organs are specific characters in contrast to monstrosities. {168} Minute hanging horns are mentioned in the _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 454, vi. p. 625, as occurring in hornless breeds of cattle. {169} _Linum flavum_ is dimorphic: thyme gynodiaecious. It is not clear what point is referred to under _Geranium pyrenaicum_. {170} The author's work on duck's wings &c. is in _Var. under Dom._, Ed. 2, i. p. 299. {171} The words _vis medicatrix_ are inserted after "useless," apparently as a memorandum. Our theory, I may remark would permit an organ <to> become abortive with respect to its primary use, to be turned to any other purpose, (as the buds in a cauliflower) thus we can see no difficulty in bones of male marsupials being used as fulcrum of muscles, or style of marygold{172},--indeed in one point of view, the heads of [vertebrated] animal may be said to be abortive vertebrae turned into other use: legs of some crustacea abortive jaws, &c., &c. De Candolle's analogy of table covered with dishes{173}. {172} In the male florets of certain Compositae the style functions merely as a piston for forcing out the pollen. {173} <On the back of the page is the following.> If abortive organs are a trace preserved by hereditary tendency, of organ in ancestor of use, we can at once see why important in natural classification, also why more plain in young animal because, as in last section, the selection has altered the old animal most. I repeat, these wondrous facts, of parts created for no use in past and present time, all can by my theory receive simple explanation; or they receive none and we must be content with some such empty metaphor, as that of De Candolle, who compares creation to a well covered table, and says abortive organs may be compared to the dishes (some should be empty) placed symmetrically! <The following passage w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

abortive

 

organs

 

animal

 

theory

 

useless

 

covered

 
dishes
 

analogy

 
turned
 
receive

Candolle

 
piston
 
forcing
 

functions

 
florets
 

Compositae

 
fulcrum
 

muscles

 
marygold
 

marsupials


difficulty

 
symmetrically
 

crustacea

 

vertebrae

 

vertebrated

 

important

 

compared

 

present

 

created

 

wondrous


simple

 

metaphor

 

compares

 
content
 
explanation
 

repeat

 

creation

 

natural

 

ancestor

 

tendency


preserved

 

hereditary

 
classification
 

selection

 
altered
 
section
 

pollen

 
importance
 
exquisite
 

possibly