FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  
ormed whether the poor man could produce the required bail, or whether he remained a prisoner till his death. Some expressions in the record of the subsequent transactions would induce us to infer that he had, after his condemnation, been at large and was again taken into custody (sub custodia carcerali iterum arrestatus). The striking fact, however, is this,--that Henry had not been dead six months before this same priest was brought up a prisoner in the custody of a jailor, and tried before the same court for a repetition of the very same offence; or rather, perhaps, for the very same (p. 409) individual act for which, a year and three quarters before, he had been condemned to perpetual imprisonment. The same accuser, the Bishop of Worcester, charged him with having, _since his abjuration aforesaid_, written, maintained, and communicated with a certain priest, named Thomas Smyth, living at Bristol, on paper in his own hand-writing, the alleged heretical opinions. Here it must be observed, that the charge was made by the same accuser, the Bishop of Worcester, before the same Judge Chicheley; that the place in which he was said to have held these doctrines was in each case the same, Bristol; that in each case the doctrines were said to have been conveyed by writing; and that, as to the time of the offence, the Bishop did not say it was after his previous condemnation, but only after his recantation, which took place in February 1420, just a year and a quarter before his sentence of imprisonment. And if we examine the four heretical opinions which were extracted, in 1423, by the Canonists out of his written communication to Thomas Smyth, we shall find them in substance nothing more or less than two of the opinions on which he was before condemned to imprisonment in 1421. 1.--All prayer which is a petition for any supernatural or gratuitous gift, is to be offered to God alone. 2.--Prayer is to be addressed only to God.[302] (p. 410) [Footnote 302: The Canonists seem to have made some distinction between the first and the second of these sentences.] 3.--To pray to any creature is to commit idolatry. 4.--The faithful ought to address their prayers to God, not in reference to his humanity, but only with regard to his Deity. This was the sum of his offence, involving precisely the identical opinions of which he had been pronou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  



Top keywords:

opinions

 

Bishop

 

offence

 

imprisonment

 

Bristol

 
Canonists
 

condemned

 

accuser

 
written
 

Worcester


Thomas
 
priest
 

custody

 

condemnation

 
doctrines
 

prisoner

 

writing

 

heretical

 

substance

 
recantation

extracted

 

sentence

 
quarter
 

examine

 

communication

 

February

 
gratuitous
 

faithful

 
address
 
idolatry

commit

 

creature

 
prayers
 

involving

 

precisely

 

identical

 

pronou

 

reference

 

humanity

 
regard

sentences

 

supernatural

 

previous

 

offered

 

petition

 
prayer
 

distinction

 

Footnote

 

Prayer

 
addressed