FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  
hat's it," we said. "Give it to us that way." "It amounts, if one may boil it down into a phrase--" "Boil it, boil it," we interrupted. "Amounts, if one takes the mere gist of it--" "Take it," we said, "take it." "Amounts to the resolution of the ultimate atom." "Ha!" we exclaimed. "I must ask you first to clear your mind," the Professor continued, "of all conception of ponderable magnitude." We nodded. We had already cleared our mind of this. "In fact," added the Professor, with what we thought a quiet note of warning in his voice, "I need hardly tell you that what we are dealing with must be regarded as altogether ultramicroscopic." We hastened to assure the Professor that, in accordance with the high standards of honour represented by our journal, we should of course regard anything that he might say as ultramicroscopic and treat it accordingly. "You say, then," we continued, "that the essence of the problem is the resolution of the atom. Do you think you can give us any idea of what the atom is?" The Professor looked at us searchingly. We looked back at him, openly and frankly. The moment was critical for our interview. Could he do it? Were we the kind of person that he could give it to? Could we get it if he did? "I think I can," he said. "Let us begin with the assumption that the atom is an infinitesimal magnitude. Very good. Let us grant, then, that though it is imponderable and indivisible it must have a spacial content? You grant me this?" "We do," we said, "we do more than this, we _give_ it to you." "Very well. If spacial, it must have dimension: if dimension--form. Let us assume _ex hypothesi_ the form to be that of a spheroid and see where it leads us." The Professor was now intensely interested. He walked to and fro in his laboratory. His features worked with excitement. We worked ours, too, as sympathetically as we could. "There is no other possible method in inductive science," he added, "than to embrace some hypothesis, the most attractive that one can find, and remain with it--" We nodded. Even in our own humble life after our day's work we had found this true. "Now," said the Professor, planting himself squarely in front of us, "assuming a spherical form, and a spacial content, assuming the dynamic forces that are familiar to us and assuming--the thing is bold, I admit--" We looked as bold as we could. "Assuming that the _ions_, or _nuclei_ of the at
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Professor

 
spacial
 

assuming

 

looked

 

dimension

 

Amounts

 

ultramicroscopic

 

nodded

 

resolution

 

continued


content

 

magnitude

 

worked

 

intensely

 

features

 

walked

 

laboratory

 

interested

 

assume

 

indivisible


imponderable

 

spheroid

 

hypothesi

 

excitement

 

method

 

planting

 

squarely

 

spherical

 

Assuming

 

nuclei


dynamic

 

forces

 
familiar
 
infinitesimal
 

inductive

 

science

 

sympathetically

 

embrace

 

humble

 

remain


hypothesis

 

attractive

 

amounts

 

dealing

 

warning

 

regarded

 

interrupted

 

standards

 

honour

 
represented