FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
a large. A head as big as the palm of your hand is not a very severe test of your powers; but in one as large as the _whole_ of your hand, say a head seven inches from crown to chin, the problem is increased quite immeasurably in difficulty. The real test is being able to produce in glass a real facsimile of a head by Botticelli or Holbein, and when you can do that satisfactorily you can do anything in glass-painting. Do not aim to get _too much_ in the first painting, at any rate not till you have had long practice. Be content if you get enough modelling on a head to turn the outline into a more sensitive and artistic drawing than it could be if planted down, raw and hard, upon the bare, cold glass. After all it is a common practice to fire the outline separately, and anything beyond this that you get upon the glass for first fire is so much to the good. But besides the quality of the _gum_ you will find sometimes differences in the quality or condition of the _pigment_. It may be insufficiently ground; in which case the matt, in passing over, will rasp away every vestige of the outline, so delicate a matter it is. You can tell when colour is not ground sufficiently by the way it acts when laid as a vertical wash. Lay a wash, moist enough to "run," on a bit of your easel-slab; it will run down, making a sort of seaweed-looking pattern--clear lanes of light on the glass with a black grain at the lower end. Those are the bits of unground material: under a 100-diameter microscope they look like chunks of ironstone or road metal, or of rusty iron, and you'll soon understand why they have scratched away your tender outline. You must grind such colour till it is smooth, and an old-fashioned _granite_ muller is the thing, not a glass one. Now, after all this, how am I to excuse the paradox that it is possible to have the colour ground _too_ fine! All one can say is that you "find it so." It can be so fine that it seems to slip about in a thin, oily kind of way. It's all as you find it; the differences of a craft are endless; there is no forecasting of everything, and you must buy your experience, like everybody else, and find what suits you, learning your skill and your materials side by side. Now these are the chief processes of painting, as far as laying on colour goes; but you still have much of your work before you, for the way in which light and shade is got on glass is almost more in "taking off" than i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
colour
 

outline

 

painting

 

ground

 

quality

 
differences
 

practice

 
chunks
 

ironstone

 
microscope

smooth
 

understand

 

material

 

fashioned

 
unground
 
tender
 

scratched

 

diameter

 

materials

 
processes

learning
 

experience

 

laying

 

taking

 
excuse
 

paradox

 
muller
 

endless

 

forecasting

 

granite


satisfactorily

 
facsimile
 
Botticelli
 
Holbein
 
artistic
 
drawing
 

planted

 
sensitive
 

content

 
modelling

produce

 

powers

 
inches
 
severe
 

difficulty

 

immeasurably

 
problem
 

increased

 

vertical

 

sufficiently