FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393  
394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   >>   >|  
th a companion picture of two lovers bathing at night; _Pile ou Face_ (a girl who is so divided between two lovers that a friend advises her to toss up, with the pessimist-satiric addition that no doubt, between tossing and marriage, she will be sorry she did not take the other, but afterwards will forget all about him) is slighter; and _Au Docteur J. P._ looks like a kind of study for a longer novel or at least a more elaborate novel-hero.[379] [Sidenote: _Affaire Clemenceau._] And so, at last, we may come to the book which curiously carries out, with a slight deflection, but an almost equivalent intensification, of meaning, what has been observed before of others--the singular habit which Dumas _fils_ has of quickening up for the run-in. This book was, I believe, in all important respects actually his run-in for the novel-prize; and what he had hitherto shown in the conduct of individual books he now showed in regard to his whole novel-list, betaking himself thenceforward, though he had nearly a third of a century to live, to the theatre, to pamphlets, etc. Against _Affaire Clemenceau_[380] there are some things to be said, and in criticism, not necessarily hostile, a great many about it. But nobody who knows strength when he sees it can deny that this is a strong book from start to finish. I can very well remember the hubbub it caused when it first appeared, and the debates about "Tue-la!" but I did not then read it, having, as I have confessed, a sort of prejudice--not then or at any time common with me--against the author--a prejudice strengthened rather than weakened by reviews of the book. What did I care (I am bound to say that I might add, "What _do_ I care?") about discussions whether if somebody breaks the Seventh Commandment to your discomfort you may break the Sixth to theirs? Did I want diatribes on the non-moral character of women, or anything of that sort? I wanted an interesting story; an attractive (no matter in what fashion) heroine; a hero who is a gentleman, if possible, a man anyhow; and I did not think I should find them here. _Now_, I can "dichotomise" to some extent; and I can get an interesting story, striking moments, if not exactly an attractive heroine or hero, at any rate such as take their part in the interest, though I may have crows to pluck with them. It is, once more, a strong book: it is nearly--though I do not think quite--a great book. And to all sportsmanlike lovers of letters it
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393  
394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

lovers

 

heroine

 

prejudice

 

Affaire

 

Clemenceau

 
attractive
 

interesting

 

strong

 
reviews
 

weakened


strengthened
 
common
 

appeared

 

caused

 
confessed
 

debates

 

hubbub

 

remember

 

finish

 
author

extent

 

dichotomise

 
striking
 

moments

 

sportsmanlike

 

letters

 
interest
 

gentleman

 
discomfort
 
Commandment

Seventh

 

breaks

 
wanted
 

matter

 

fashion

 

character

 

diatribes

 

discussions

 

criticism

 
curiously

Sidenote

 

elaborate

 

carries

 

meaning

 

observed

 
intensification
 

equivalent

 

slight

 

deflection

 
longer