FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289  
290   291   292   >>  
e frame and huge foundation of the earth Shook like a coward. And Shakespeare showed himself dangerously tainted with freethought in assigning (even to the fiery Hotspur) the reply: So it would have done At the same season, if your mother's cat Had kittened, though yourself had ne'er been born. In a similar vein Butler, in _Hudibras_ ridiculed the folly of those who believe in horoscopes and nativities: As if the planet's first aspect The tender infant did infect In soul and body, and instil All future good and future ill; Which in their dark fatalities lurking, At destined periods fall a-working, And break out, like the hidden seeds Of long diseases, into deeds, In friendships, enmities, and strife. And all th' emergencies of life. [3] Preface to the _Rudolphine Tables_. [4] It is commonly stated that Bacon opposed the Copernican theory because he disliked Gilbert, who had advocated it. 'Bacon,' says one of his editors, 'was too jealous of Gilbert to entertain one moment any doctrine that he advanced.' But, apart from the incredible littleness of mind which this explanation imputes to Bacon, it would also have been an incredible piece of folly on Bacon's part to advocate an inferior theory while a rival was left to support a better theory. Bacon saw clearly enough that men were on their way to the discovery of the true theory, and, so far as in him lay, he indicated how they should proceed in order most readily to reach the truth. It must, then, have been from conviction, not out of mere contradiction, that Bacon declared himself in favour of the Ptolemaic system. In fact, he speaks of the diurnal motion of the earth as 'an opinion which we can demonstrate to be most false;' doubtless having in his thoughts some such arguments as misled Tycho Brahe. [5] To Bacon's theological contemporaries this must have seemed a dreadful heresy, and possibly in our own days the assertion would be judged scarcely less harshly, seeing that the observance of the (so-called) Sabbath depends directly upon the belief in quite another origin of the week. Yet there can be little question that the week really had its origin in astrological formulae. [6] In Bohn's edition the word 'defective' is here used, entirely changing the meaning of the sentence. Bacon registers an _Astrologia Sana_ amongst the things needed for the advancement of learning, whereas he is made to say that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289  
290   291   292   >>  



Top keywords:
theory
 

origin

 
incredible
 

Gilbert

 
future
 

conviction

 

sentence

 
registers
 

readily

 

Astrologia


meaning
 

system

 

Ptolemaic

 

speaks

 

diurnal

 
favour
 

declared

 
contradiction
 
changing
 

discovery


learning

 

proceed

 

motion

 

needed

 

advancement

 

things

 

Sabbath

 

called

 

depends

 

directly


edition
 

observance

 

judged

 
assertion
 

scarcely

 

harshly

 

belief

 

astrological

 
question
 
formulae

thoughts

 

arguments

 
misled
 

doubtless

 

demonstrate

 

defective

 

support

 

dreadful

 

heresy

 

possibly