FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256  
257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   >>   >|  
a personification of an abstraction, like Ops, Fides, and Salus. See Axtell, _Deification of abstract idea in Roman literature_, p. 9, with whom I agree in rejecting the notion of Marquardt and Wissowa that she was a deity of horticulture. He rightly points out that she is not included in the list of agricultural deities in Varro, _R.R._ i. 1. 6. [494] See Aust in his article "Jupiter" in the _Myth. Lex._ p. 689, where the evidence for the contemporaneous origin of the temple on the Alban hill and that on the Capitol is fully stated. In this case excavations have confirmed the Roman tradition, which ascribed the former temple to one or other of the Tarquinii. Jordan, _Roem. Top._ i. pt. 2. p. 9. [495] See the speech of Claudius the emperor, _C.I.L._ xiii. 1668, printed in Furneaux' _Tacitus' Annals_, vol. ii. Gardthausen, _Mastarna_, p. 40; Mueller-Deecke, _Etrusker_, i. 111. For the Etruscan name Mastarna, see Dennis, _Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria_^3, ii. 506 foll.: Gardthausen gives a cut of the painting found in a tomb at Vulci in which he appears with the name attached. Even the ultra-sceptical Pais does not doubt the fact of an Etruscan domination in Rome; but he does not believe the Tarquinii and Mastarna to have been historical personages, and will not date the temples attributed to this age earlier than the fourth century B.C. See his _Ancient Legends of Roman History_, ch. vii.; _Storia di Roma_, i. 310 foll. But the names of these kings do not concern us, except so far as they connect Etruria with Roman history in the sixth century. [496] Cic. _Rep._ ii. 24. 44; Livy i. 38. and 55; Dionys. iii. 69; iv. 59. 61. The whole evidence will be found collected in Jordan, _Topogr._ i. pt. ii. p. 9 foll., and in Aust, _Myth. Lex._, _s.v._ Jupiter, p. 706 foll. If the date 509 were seriously impugned Roman chronology would be in confusion, for this is believed to be the earliest date on which we can rely, and on it the subsequent chronology hangs: Mommsen, _Roem. Chronologie_, ed. 2, p. 198. [497] Aust, p. 707 foll.; Jordan, _op. cit._, p. 9. [498] _i.e._ the admission of more than one deity into a single building. The word "trias" is sometimes used of the three old Roman deities, Jupiter, Mars, Quirinus (_e.g._ by Wissowa, _Myth. L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256  
257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Jupiter
 

Jordan

 
Mastarna
 

chronology

 
Etruscan
 

temple

 

evidence

 
Etruria
 

Gardthausen

 

Tarquinii


century
 

Wissowa

 

deities

 

fourth

 

earlier

 
Storia
 

Dionys

 
History
 
concern
 

Ancient


history

 

connect

 

Legends

 

admission

 

Mommsen

 

Chronologie

 

single

 

Quirinus

 

building

 

subsequent


Topogr
 

attributed

 

collected

 
earliest
 

believed

 

impugned

 

confusion

 

contemporaneous

 
origin
 
article

agricultural

 

confirmed

 
tradition
 

ascribed

 

excavations

 

Capitol

 

stated

 

included

 

Axtell

 

Deification