FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  
it by guess. That this is not an unfair statement of the case is well shown by the following candid confession by a psychologist who tested 200 juvenile delinquents brought before Judge Lindsey's court:-- [35] See this volume, p. 24 _ff._ As a matter of interest I estimated the mental ages of 150 of my subjects before testing them. In 54 of the estimates the error was not more than one year in either direction; 70 of the subjects were estimated too high, the average error being 2 years and 7 months; 26 of the subjects were estimated too low, the average error being 2 years and 2 months. _These figures would seem to imply that an estimate with nothing to support it is wholly unreliable, more especially as many of the estimates were four or five years wide of the mark._[36] [36] C. S. Bluemel: "Binet Tests on 200 Delinquents," in _The Training School Bulletin_ (1915), p. 192. (Italics inserted.) Criticisms of the Binet method have also been frequently voiced, but chiefly by persons who have had little experience with it or by those whose scientific training hardly justifies an opinion. It cannot be too strongly emphasized that eminence in law, medicine, education, or any other profession does not of itself enable any one to pass judgment on the validity of a psychological method. DEPENDENCE OF THE SCALE'S RELIABILITY ON THE TRAINING OF THE EXAMINER. On this point two radically different opinions have been urged. On the one hand, some have insisted that the results of a test made by other than a thoroughly trained psychologist are absolutely worthless. At the opposite extreme are a few who seem to think that any teacher or physician can secure perfectly valid results after a few hours' acquaintance with the tests. The dispute is one which cannot be settled by the assertion of opinion, and, unfortunately, thoroughgoing investigations have not yet been made as to the frequency and extent of errors made by untrained or partially trained examiners. The only study of this kind which has so far been reported is the following:--[37] [37] Samuel C. Kohs: "The Binet Test and the Training of Teachers," in _The Training School Bulletin_ (1914), pp. 113-17. Dr. Kohs gives the results of tests made by 58 inexperienced teachers who were taking a summer course in the Training School at Vineland. The class met three times a week for instruction in the use of the Binet scale. Du
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Training

 

results

 

School

 
estimated
 
subjects
 

method

 
average
 

months

 

estimates

 

Bulletin


opinion
 

psychologist

 

trained

 

RELIABILITY

 

psychological

 
teacher
 

validity

 

absolutely

 

TRAINING

 
physician

EXAMINER

 
insisted
 

opposite

 

DEPENDENCE

 

extreme

 

radically

 

worthless

 
opinions
 

frequency

 

inexperienced


teachers

 

taking

 

summer

 

Teachers

 

instruction

 

Vineland

 

Samuel

 

assertion

 

thoroughgoing

 

investigations


settled

 

dispute

 

perfectly

 

acquaintance

 

judgment

 

extent

 
reported
 

errors

 

untrained

 

partially