FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>  
ingenuously speaking, we cannot claim the merit of a felicitous foresight. That result _has_ come round which we foreboded; but not in that sense which we intended to authorize, nor exactly by those steps which we wished to see. We looked for the extinction of this national scourge by its own inevitable decays: through its own organization we had hoped that the Repeal Association should be confounded: we trusted that an enthusiasm, founded in ignorance, and which, in no one stage, could be said to have prospered, must finally droop _spontaneously_, and that once _having_ drooped, through mere defect of actions that bore any meaning, or tendencies that offered any promise, by no felicities of intrigue could it ever be revived. Whether we erred in the philosophy of our anticipations, cannot now be known; for, whether wrong or right in theory, in practice our expectation has been abruptly cut short. _A deus ex machina_ has descended amongst us abruptly, and intercepted the natural evolution of the plot: the executive Government has summarily effected the _peripetteia_ by means of a _coup d'etat_; and the end, such as we augured, has been brought about by means essentially different. Yet, if thus far we were found in error, would _not that_ argue a corresponding error in the Government? If we, relying on the self-consistency of the executive, and _because_ we relied on that self-consistency, predicted a particular solution for the _nodus_ of Repeal, which solution has now become impossible; presuming a perseverance in the original policy of ministers, now that its natural fruits were rapidly ripening--whereas, after all, at the eleventh hour we find them adopting that course which, with stronger temptation, they had refused to adopt in the first hour--were this the true portrait of the case, would it be ourselves that erred, or Government?--ourselves in counting on steadiness, or Government in acting with caprice? Meantime, _is_ this the portrait of the case? _That_ we shall know when Parliament meets; and possibly not before. At present the attempts to explain, to reconcile, and, as it were, to construe the Government system of policy, is first almost neglecting the Irish sedition, and then (after half-a-year's sedentary and distant skirmishing, by means of Chancery letters) suddenly, on the 7th day of October, leaping into the arena armed cap-a-pie, dividing themselves like a bomb-shell amongst the conspirators, rendi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>  



Top keywords:

Government

 

abruptly

 

portrait

 

policy

 

Repeal

 

solution

 

consistency

 

natural

 

executive

 

felicitous


stronger

 

temptation

 

adopting

 
foresight
 

refused

 

counting

 
steadiness
 
acting
 

caprice

 

speaking


relying

 

eleventh

 
impossible
 

predicted

 

relied

 

presuming

 

perseverance

 

ripening

 

Meantime

 

rapidly


fruits

 

original

 

result

 

ministers

 

foreboded

 

October

 

leaping

 

suddenly

 

distant

 

skirmishing


Chancery

 

letters

 

conspirators

 
dividing
 

sedentary

 

present

 

attempts

 

possibly

 
Parliament
 
explain