FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   >>   >|  
again--better had he so bethought him before his colonial debut in the House last June--would it not be the part of wisdom to take counsel with his dear friend and neighbour Mr Samuel Brookes, the well-known opulent calico-printer, manufacturer, and exporting merchant of Manchester, who proved, some three or four years ago, as clearly as figures--made up, like the restaurateur's _pain_, at discretion--can prove any thing, that the larger the foreign trade he carried on, the greater were his losses, in various instances cited of hundreds per cent; from whence, seeing how rotund and robust grows the worthy alderman, deplorable balance-sheets notwithstanding, which would prostrate the Bank of England like the Bank of Manchester, it should result that he, like another Themistocles, might exclaim to his family, clad in purple and fine linen, "My children, had we not been ruined, we should have been undone!" But _revenons a nos moutons_. According to Mr Cobden's _new_ facts, borrowed from Porter's Tables, so far as the figures, the superior importance and profit of foreign trade should be measured by the gross quantities, and be, say, as 35 to 16. We have shown that the relation of profit really stands as 31 to 23, starting from the same basis of total amounts as himself. The total profit upon a foreign trade of thirty-five millions, to place it on an equal rateable footing with colonial, should be, not three millions and an eighth, but upwards of five millions, or the colonial trade of sixteen millions, if no more gainful than foreign, should be, not L.2,300,000, but about one million less. And here the question naturally recurs, assuming the principle of Mr Cobden to be correct--as so, for his satisfaction, it has been reasoned hitherto--at what rate of charge nationally are these profits, colonial and foreign, purchased? Fortunately the materials for the estimates are already in hand, and here they are: Colonial trade--cost in Army, Navy, Ordnance, &c., L.3,000,000 Colonial trade--profit to exporters, 2,302,000 ---------- Deficit--loss to the country, L.698,000 Foreign trade--cost in Army, Navy, Ordnance, &c., L.4,500,000 Foreign trade exporting profit, 3,125,000 ---------- Deficit--loss to the country,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

foreign

 

profit

 

colonial

 

millions

 

figures

 

Manchester

 
country
 

Deficit

 

Foreign

 

Cobden


Colonial
 

exporting

 

Ordnance

 

quantities

 

eighth

 

measured

 

footing

 

rateable

 
relation
 

stands


upwards

 
amounts
 

starting

 

thirty

 

assuming

 
profits
 

purchased

 
Fortunately
 

materials

 

nationally


charge

 

estimates

 

exporters

 

hitherto

 

reasoned

 

million

 

gainful

 
correct
 

satisfaction

 

principle


importance
 
question
 

naturally

 
recurs
 
sixteen
 
children
 

manufacturer

 

merchant

 

proved

 

restaurateur