FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916  
917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  
ed up Maret's note; the sentence quoted above is doubtless the Emperor's. The same author proves that Maret's advice had always been more pacific than was supposed, and that now, in his old position of Secretary of State, he gave Caulaincourt valuable help during the negotiations at Chatillon.] [Footnote 389: "Castlereagh Papers," 3rd series, vol. i., p. 74. This was written, of course, before he heard of the Frankfurt proposals; but it anticipates them in a remarkable way. Thiers states that Castlereagh, after hearing of them, sent Aberdeen new instructions. I cannot find any in our archives. This letter warned Aberdeen against any compromise on the subject of Antwerp; but it is clear that Castlereagh, when he came to the allied headquarters, was a partisan of peace, as compared with the Czar and the Prussian patriots. Schwarzenberg wrote (January 26th) at Langres: "We ought to make peace here: our Kaiser, also Stadion, Metternich, even Castlereagh, are fully of this opinion--but Kaiser Alexander!"] [Footnote 390: Fournier, "Der Congress von Chatillon," p. 242.] [Footnote 391: "Castlereagh Papers," _loc. cit._, p. 112.] [Footnote 392: Metternich. "Memoirs," vol. i., p. 214.] [Footnote 393: "F.O.," Austria, No. 102.] [Footnote 394: "Lettres inedites" (November 6th, 1813).] [Footnote 395: The memorandum is endorsed, "Extract of Instructions delivered to me by Gen. Pozzo di Borgo, 18 Dec, 1813" ("Russia," No. 92).] [Footnote 396: Metternich's letter to Hudelist, in Fournier, p. 242.] [Footnote 397: Houssaye's "1814," p. 14; Metternich, "Memoirs," vol. i., p. 308.] [Footnote 398: "Our success and everything depend upon our moderation and justice," he wrote to Lord Bathurst (Napier, bk. xxiii., ch. ii.).] [Footnote 399: "Lettres inedites" (November 12th). The date is important: it refutes Napier's statement (bk. xxiii., ch. iv.) that the Emperor had planned that Ferdinand should enter Spain early in November when the disputes between Wellington and the Cortes at Madrid were at their height. Bignon (vol. xiii., p. 88 _et seq._) says that Talleyrand's indiscretion revealed the negotiations to the Spanish Cortes and Wellington; but our general's despatches show that he did not hear of them before January 9th or 10th. He then wrote: "I have long suspected that Bonaparte would adopt this expedient; and if he had had less pride and more common sense, it would have succeeded."] [Footnote 400: On January
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916  
917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Castlereagh

 

Metternich

 

January

 

November

 

letter

 

Aberdeen

 
Kaiser
 
Wellington
 
Cortes

Napier

 

Fournier

 

Memoirs

 

inedites

 

Lettres

 

negotiations

 

Chatillon

 

Emperor

 
Papers
 

Bathurst


doubtless

 

quoted

 

sentence

 
depend
 

moderation

 

justice

 

planned

 

Ferdinand

 
statement
 

important


refutes

 

success

 

Instructions

 

delivered

 
Russia
 
Houssaye
 

Hudelist

 

suspected

 

Bonaparte

 

succeeded


common

 

expedient

 

height

 

Bignon

 
Madrid
 

disputes

 

Spanish

 

general

 
despatches
 

revealed