FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
ss to admit them to the Union as the state of Maine. [Sidenote: Objections to the admission of Missouri.] 278. Opposition to the Admission of Missouri.--Many people in the North opposed the admission of Missouri because the settlers of the proposed state were slaveholders. Missouri would be a slave state, and these Northerners did not want any more slave states. Originally slavery had existed in all the old thirteen states. But every state north of Maryland had before 1819 either put an end to slavery or had adopted some plan by which slavery would gradually come to an end. Slavery had been excluded from the Northwest by the famous Ordinance of 1787 (p. 135). In these ways slavery had ceased to be a vital institution north of Maryland and Kentucky. Why should slavery be allowed west of the Mississippi River? Louisiana had been admitted as a slave state (1812). But the admission of Louisiana had been provided for in the treaty for the purchase of Louisiana from France. The Southerners felt as strongly on the other side. They said that their slaves were their property, and that they had a perfect right to take their property and settle on the land belonging to the nation. Having founded a slave state, it was only right that the state should be admitted to the Union. [Illustration: (Map) Missouri Compromise of 1820] [Sidenote: This Missouri Compromise, 1820. _Higginson_, 254-256; _Eggleston_, 258-261.] [Sidenote: Both states admitted, 1820. _McMaster_,274-276.] 279. The Missouri Compromise, 1820.--When the question of the admission of Maine and Missouri came before Congress, the Senate was equally divided between the slave states and the free states. But the majority of the House of Representatives was from the free states. The free states were growing faster than were the slave states and would probably keep on growing faster. The majority from the free states in the House, therefore, would probably keep on increasing. If the free states obtained a majority in the Senate also, the Southerners would lose all control of the government. For these reasons the Southerners would not consent to the admission of Maine as a free state unless at the same time Missouri was admitted as a slave state. After a long struggle Maine and Missouri were both admitted--the one as a free state, the other as a slave state. But it was also agreed that all of the Louisiana purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri, with the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Missouri

 

states

 

slavery

 
admitted
 

admission

 

Louisiana

 

Compromise

 

Southerners

 
Sidenote
 

majority


growing

 
faster
 

property

 
purchase
 

Senate

 

Maryland

 

agreed

 
southern
 

Higginson

 

Eggleston


Illustration

 
consent
 

Having

 

nation

 

belonging

 

founded

 
boundary
 

reasons

 
government
 

Representatives


control

 

increasing

 

obtained

 

divided

 
McMaster
 
struggle
 
equally
 

Congress

 

question

 

thirteen


Opposition

 

adopted

 
Slavery
 

excluded

 

gradually

 

existed

 
Northerners
 

opposed

 

proposed

 

settlers