FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208  
209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   >>   >|  
the Africans. However they work, the spirits work for righteousness.] [Footnote 33: Obviously there could be no Family God before there was the institution of the Family.] [Footnote 34: Callaway, _Rel. of Amazulu_, p. 17.] [Footnote 35: Callaway, p. 1.] [Footnote 36: Op. cit. p. 8.] [Footnote 37: Op. cit. p. 7.] [Footnote 38: Op. cit. p. 19.] [Footnote 39: Callaway, pp. 20, 21.] [Footnote 40: Pp. 26, 27.] [Footnote 41: Pp. 49, 50.] [Footnote 42: P. 67.] [Footnote 43: P. 122.] XIII MORE SAVAGE SUPREME BEINGS If many of the lowest savages known to us entertain ideas of a Supreme Being such as we find among Fuegians, Australians, Bushmen, and Andamanese, are there examples, besides the Zulus, of tribes higher in material culture who seem to have had such notions, but to have partly forgotten or neglected them? Miss Kingsley, a lively, observant, and unprejudiced, though rambling writer, gives this very account of the Bantu races. Oblivion, or neglect, will show itself in leaving the Supreme Being alone, as he needs no propitiation, while devoting sacrifice and ritual to fetishes and ghosts. That this should be done is perfectly natural if the Supreme Being (who wants no sacrifice) were the first evolved in thought, while venal fetishes and spirits came in as a result of the ghost theory. But if, as a result of the ghost theory, the Supreme Being came last in evolution, he ought to be the most fashionable object of worship, the latest developed, the most powerful, and most to be propitiated. He is the reverse. To take an example: the Dinkas of the Upper Nile ('godless,' says Sir Samuel Baker) 'pay a very theoretical kind of homage to the all-powerful Being, dwelling in heaven, whence he sees all things. He is called "Dendid" (great rain, that is, universal benediction?).' He is omnipotent, but, being all beneficence, can do no evil; so, not being feared, he is not addressed in prayer. The evil spirit, on the other hand, receives sacrifices. The Dinkas have a strange old chant: 'At the beginning, when Dendid made all things, He created the Sun, And the Sun is born, and dies, and comes again! He created the Stars, And the Stars are born, and die, and come again! He created Man, And Man is born, and dies, and returns no more!' It is like the lament of Moschus.[1] Russegger compares the Dinkas, and all the neighbouring peoples who hold the same beliefs, to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208  
209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Supreme

 

Dinkas

 

created

 
Callaway
 
Dendid
 

powerful

 

things

 

spirits

 

Family


fetishes

 

theory

 

sacrifice

 

result

 

Samuel

 

theoretical

 

godless

 
worship
 

evolution

 

thought


evolved
 
beliefs
 

fashionable

 

object

 

reverse

 

latest

 

developed

 
propitiated
 

universal

 

beginning


receives

 
sacrifices
 

strange

 
lament
 

Moschus

 

Russegger

 
compares
 
returns
 

peoples

 

called


homage

 

dwelling

 

heaven

 

neighbouring

 

feared

 

addressed

 
prayer
 

spirit

 
benediction
 

omnipotent