FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  
r reports developed that on account of intimidation, frauds and violence, committed in the election in Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida, the vote of each of those states was doubtful, and could only be ascertained by the reports of the returning boards. All of their electoral votes were needed to give Hayes the majority of one. Both parties claimed in each of the states a majority of the popular vote. In the heated state of political feeling in those states, it was a matter of grave doubt whether the count of the vote might not result in violence, tumult or war. On the evening of November 11, I received from President Grant the following telegram: "Philadelphia, Pa., November 11, 1876. "Received at Mansfield, O., 8:35 p. m. "Senator John Sherman. "I would be much pleased if you would join other parties, who have already accepted same invitation, to go to New Orleans to witness the canvassing of the vote of Louisiana. "U. S. Grant." I replied that I would go as soon as practicable, and received the following answer: "Washington, D. C., November 12, 1876. "Received at Mansfield, O., 4 p. m. "Hon. John Sherman. "Unless you can reach there by Friday morning it will be too late. "U. S. Grant." I at once started for New Orleans, stopping on the way at Columbus to confer with Governor Hayes, who said he wished I would go to New Orleans, and witness the count, but expressed, in the strongest possible language, his opposition to any movement on the part of anyone to influence the action of the returning board in his favor. He said that if Mr. Tilden was elected he desired him by all means to have the office. I proceeded to Cincinnati, where I met some of the gentlemen whom General Grant had requested to witness the count. When we arrived in New Orleans I found far less excitement in respect to the count than in Ohio. I there met the other gentlemen who had been, like myself, invited by General Grant. They were Messrs. Stanley Matthews, Ohio; J. A. Garfield, Ohio; E. W. Stoughton, New York; J. H. Van Alen, New York; Wm. D. Kelley, Pennsylvania; Job E. Stevenson, Ohio; Eugene Hale, Maine; J. M. Tuttle, Iowa; J. W. Chapman, Iowa; W. R. Smith, Iowa; W. A. McGrew, Iowa; Sidney Clarke, Kansas; C. B. Farwell, Illinois; Abner Taylor, Illinois; S. R. Haven, Illinois; J. M. Beardsley, Illinois; John Coburn, Indiana; Will Cumback, Indiana; C. Irving Ditty, Maryland. At New Orleans I was for
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Orleans
 

Illinois

 

November

 

witness

 
states
 

gentlemen

 
Sherman
 

reports

 
Received
 
Mansfield

received

 

General

 

Louisiana

 

majority

 

Indiana

 
violence
 
returning
 

parties

 

respect

 
excitement

arrived

 

Tilden

 

action

 

movement

 

influence

 

elected

 

desired

 

Cincinnati

 
requested
 
proceeded

office

 
Garfield
 

Kansas

 

Farwell

 

Clarke

 

Sidney

 

Chapman

 
McGrew
 

Taylor

 
Irving

Maryland

 

Cumback

 

Beardsley

 
Coburn
 
Tuttle
 

Stanley

 

Matthews

 

developed

 

Messrs

 

invited