FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206  
207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>  
n a second part designation other than the appropriate formula. On the whole, however, it is usually desirable to have a second part, collective designation, rather than a formula only. Whether such designation should be a Latin name or a vernacular phrase, or both, depends on a number of factors which, as I have said, are not yet fully worked out or appreciated. Broadly speaking, if there are a large number of cultivars of a particular cross and these cultivars form a well-marked group, distinct from other hybrid groups in the genus, it is useful to have a vernacular designation for general use, _e.g._ 'Bellingham Hybrids' for all cultivars of the cross _Lilium Humboldtii_ x _pardalinum_. This purpose can, however, be equally well served by a Latin name, _e.g. Camellia_ x _Williamsii_ for all cultivars of the cross _C. japonica_ x _saluenensis_. Whichever method is chosen, two points are of great importance. Firstly, if a Latin name is given, it _must_ be accompanied by a Latin description. Secondly a vernacular designation _must_ contain some such word as Hybrids, Crosses, or the like, to distinguish it from a cultivar-name. The practice, in some groups, of giving "straight" cultivar-names as second part collective designations, followed by "var. so-and-so," is condemned by the Code. Existing names of this kind, however, can easily be brought into line by adding a word such as Hybrids or Grex to the old, second part, cultivar-name, and omitting the "var." thus, _Cattleya_ 'Fabia' var. 'Prince of Wales,' would become _C._ ('Fabia Grex') 'Prince of Wales' (Grex can he abbreviated to G. if desired). This alteration may seem over-pedantic, but if, in the naming of cultivated hybrids, a clear distinction is not kept between second and third part names, confusion, as I have pointed out, is likely to result. I will finish this section on the naming of hybrids with one or two additional points on the correct method of writing their names. Here are the full names of three cultivated hybrids:-- _Rubus_ (_rusticanus inermis_ X _thyrsiger_) 'Merton Thornless.' _Camellia_ X _Williamsii_ 'Donation.' Rose (Hybrid Tea) 'Richmond.' The following points should be noted:-- (_a_) If a formula or a vernacular designation is used as a second part name, it should be placed in brackets between the generic name and the cultivar-name. (_b_) If a Latin name is used as a second part name, and the hybrid is between plants belo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206  
207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>  



Top keywords:

designation

 

cultivars

 

vernacular

 

cultivar

 

Hybrids

 

hybrids

 
points
 

formula

 
groups
 
method

hybrid

 
naming
 
cultivated
 

Williamsii

 
Prince
 

Camellia

 
collective
 

number

 
desired
 

pedantic


alteration

 
Cattleya
 

omitting

 

adding

 

plants

 

Richmond

 

generic

 

brackets

 

abbreviated

 

Hybrid


result

 

finish

 

section

 
correct
 
writing
 

rusticanus

 

distinction

 

Donation

 

additional

 

Thornless


Merton

 

inermis

 
pointed
 

confusion

 
thyrsiger
 
speaking
 

Broadly

 
worked
 
appreciated
 

general