FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   >>  
peruse me, by explaining the word _Incubus_; which Pliny and others, more learnedly, call _Ephialtes_.--I, modestly, state it to mean the _Night-Mare_, for the information of the Ladies. The chief symptom by which this affliction is vulgarly known, is a heavy pressure upon the stomach, when lying in a supine posture in bed. It would terrify some of my fair readers, who never experience'd this characteristick of the _Incubus_, were I to dwell on its effects; and it would irritate others, who are in the habit of labouring under its sensations. [6] An old Gentlewoman, a great admirer of the BLACK LETTER, (as many _old Gentlewomen_ are) presented the Author of these Tales with the _Original MS._ of this Sonnet; advising the publication of a _facsimile_ of the Knight's hand-writing. It is painful, after this, to advance, that the Sonnet, so far from being genuine, is _one_ of the clumsiest literary forgeries, that the present times have witnessed. It appears, in this authentick Story, that Sir Thomas Erpingham was married in the reign of Henry the Fifth; and it is evidently intended, that _Moderns_ should believe he writ these love-verses almost immediately after his marriage; not only from the ardour with which he celebrates the beauty of his wife, but from the circumstance of a man writing any love-verses upon his wife at all;--but the style and language of the lines are most glaringly inconsistent with their pretended date. The fact is, we have here foisted upon us a close _imitation of_ COWLEY, (_vide the_ MISTRESS) who was not _born_ till the year 1618,--two centuries after the era in question. Chaucer died, A. D. 1400; and Henry the Fifth (who was king only 9 years, 5 months, and 11 days) began his reign scarcely 13 years after the death of that Poet. Sir Thomas, then, must, at least, have written in the obsolete phraseology of Chaucer,--and, probably, would have imitated him,--as did Lidgate, Occleve, and others;--nay, Harding, Skelton, &c. who were fifty or sixty years subsequent to Chaucer, were not so modern in their language as their celebrated predecessor. Having, _in few words_, prove'd (it is presume'd) this Sonnet to be spurious, an apology may be thought necessary for not saying _a great deal more_;--but this Herculean task is left, i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   >>  



Top keywords:

Sonnet

 

Chaucer

 

language

 

writing

 
verses
 

Thomas

 

Incubus

 

question

 

centuries

 

scarcely


months

 

MISTRESS

 

glaringly

 
inconsistent
 
explaining
 
readers
 

pretended

 

imitation

 

COWLEY

 

foisted


presume

 

peruse

 

spurious

 
celebrated
 

predecessor

 

Having

 
apology
 
Herculean
 

thought

 
modern

subsequent
 

obsolete

 
phraseology
 

imitated

 
written
 

Skelton

 

Harding

 
Lidgate
 

Occleve

 

Original


advising

 
Gentlewomen
 

presented

 

Author

 
pressure
 

publication

 

facsimile

 

affliction

 
advance
 

symptom