FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203  
204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>   >|  
er, to whom Mr. Somerled MacDonald was taking me. "And Somerled himself, and the others?" he asked. "Oh, they're going on," said I, "leaving me behind." He looked delighted; so perhaps he had not forgiven the Vannecks for laughing. BOOK III BASIL'S PLOT AND "MRS. BAL" I Will the time come, I wonder, when I can calmly "work up" these things into a plot? If so, I foresee that I shall have to toss a coin to decide on the casting of my own part in the story. Heads, I am hero; tails, I am villain. But it has always been a theory of mine that ninety-nine out of a hundred novels are unjust toward some of their principal characters. Each (alleged) villain ought to have his motives and actions explained from his own point of view, not according to that of the (also alleged) hero and heroine whom he possibly tries (with success or failure) to separate. If this were done in books, villains _qua_ villains would practically cease to exist; for it seems to me, in my experience of life as a man and a writer, that no normal, healthy villain is a villain in his own eyes. To understand all is to pardon all; and in analyzing his motives in order to justify himself to himself, he sees from every point of vantage, he knows how necessary certain actions are which appear evil to the limited view of the hero and heroine. They see him always obliquely, in profile; therefore they are prejudiced. And what is doubly unfair to the poor villain, the author of the book sympathizes with the others from first to last; whereas, if the villain were allowed to explain himself in his own way, not the author's, he would stand in the centre of the picture. Not being prejudiced against himself, he would have a chance of appealing to the readers' sense of justice. Unfortunately for me, I have a way of seeing two sides of a question at once, even when my own interests and those of another are violently opposed. This is a kind of moral colour-blindness; for to be colour-blind means merely that your eyes give you an impression of red and green at the same tune, so that you can with difficulty tell which is which. Both kinds of colour-blindness, moral and physical, handicap you for success in life. On the whole, I think the moral sort is the more inconvenient of the two. If you saw nobody's motives but your own, you would be able honestly to detest your enemy and work against him. You would then be happy and successful, because of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203  
204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

villain

 

colour

 

motives

 

heroine

 

Somerled

 

success

 

blindness

 

author

 
actions
 
alleged

villains

 

prejudiced

 
limited
 

centre

 

detest

 

obliquely

 

picture

 
unfair
 

doubly

 
sympathizes

allowed

 
profile
 

explain

 

successful

 

inconvenient

 

impression

 

physical

 

handicap

 

difficulty

 

Unfortunately


question
 

justice

 
chance
 

appealing

 

readers

 

honestly

 

violently

 

opposed

 

interests

 

vantage


calmly

 

things

 

casting

 

decide

 

foresee

 

taking

 
MacDonald
 

leaving

 

Vannecks

 

laughing