FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>  
ghts are to survive or be trampled underfoot. The Lumber Trust Wins the Jury On Saturday evening, March 13th, the jury brought in its final verdict of guilty. In the face of the very evident ability of the lumber interests, to satisfy its vengeance at will, any other verdict would have been suicidal--for the jury. The prosecution was out for blood and nothing less than blood. Day by day they had built the structure of gallows right there in the courtroom. They built a scaffolding on which to hang ten loggers--built it of lies and threats and perjury. Dozens of witnesses from the Chamber of Commerce and the American Legion took the stand to braid a hangman's rope of untruthful testimony. Some of these were members of the mob; on their white hands the blood of Wesley Everest was hardly dry. And they were not satisfied with sending their victims to prison for terms of from 25 to 40 years, they wanted the pleasure of seeing their necks broken. But they failed. Two verdicts were returned; his honor refused to accept the first; no intelligent man can accept the second. Here is the way the two verdicts compare with each other: Elmer Smith and Mike Sheehan were declared not guilty and Loren Roberts insane, in both the first and second verdicts. Britt Smith, O.C. Bland, James McInerney, Bert Bland and Ray Becker were found guilty of murder in the second degree in both instances, but Eugene Barnett and John Lamb were at first declared guilty of manslaughter, or murder "in the third degree" in the jury's first findings, and guilty of second degree murder in the second. The significant point is that the state made its strongest argument against the four men whom the jury practically exonerated of the charge of conspiring to murder. More significant is the fact that the whole verdict completely upsets the charge of conspiracy to murder under which the men were tried. The difference between first and second degree murder is that the former, first degree, implies premeditation while the other, second degree, means murder that is not premeditated. Now, how in the world can men be found guilty of conspiring to murder without previous premeditation? The verdict, brutal and stupid as it is, shows the weakness and falsity of the state's charge more eloquently than anything the defense has ever said about it. But Labor Says, "Not Guilty!" But another jury had been watching the trial. Their verdict came as a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>  



Top keywords:
murder
 

guilty

 

degree

 
verdict
 

charge

 

verdicts

 

premeditation

 

significant

 
conspiring
 
accept

declared

 

manslaughter

 

Roberts

 

insane

 

findings

 

Barnett

 

McInerney

 

Becker

 

Sheehan

 
instances

compare
 

Eugene

 
eloquently
 

defense

 

falsity

 

weakness

 

previous

 
brutal
 
stupid
 

watching


Guilty
 

exonerated

 

completely

 

upsets

 

practically

 

strongest

 

argument

 

conspiracy

 

premeditated

 

implies


difference

 

prosecution

 

suicidal

 
vengeance
 

scaffolding

 

loggers

 

courtroom

 

structure

 

gallows

 

satisfy