FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>  
instructed by their organizations to observe impartially the progress of the trial and to report back to their unions the result of their observations. Read their report: Labor's Verdict Labor Temple, Tacoma, March 15, 1920, 1:40 p.m. The Labor Jury met in the rooms of the Labor Temple and organized, electing P. K. Mohr as foreman. Present: J.A. Craft, W.J. Beard, Otto Newman, Theodore Mayer, E.W. Thrall and P.K. Mohr. 1. On motion a secret ballot of guilty or not guilty was taken, the count resulting in a unanimous "Not Guilty!" 2. Shall we give our report to the press? Verdict, "Yes." [Illustration: Labor's Silent Jury W.J. Beard, Central Labor Council, Tacoma: Paul K. Mohr, Central Labor Council, Seattle: Theodore Meyer, Central Labor Council, Everett: E.W. Thrall, Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen, Centralia: John A. Craft, Metal Trades Council, Seattle.] 3. Was there a conspiracy to raid the I.W.W. hall on the part of the business interests of Centralia? Verdict, "Yes." There was evidence offered by the defense to show that the business interests held a meeting at the Elk's Club on October 20, 1919, at which ways and means to deal with the I.W.W. situation were discussed. F.B. Hubbard, Chief of Police Hughes and William Scales, commander of the American Legion at Centralia, were present. Prosecuting Attorney Allen was quoted as having said, "There is no law that would let you run the I.W.W. out of town." Chief of Police Hughes said, "You cannot run the I.W.W. out of town; they have violated no law." F.G. Hubbard said, "It's a damn shame; if I was chief I would have them out of town in 24 hours." William Scales, presiding at the meeting, said that although he was not in favor of a raid, there was no American jury that would convict them if they did, or words to that effect. He then announced that he would appoint a secret committee to deal with the I.W.W. situation. 4. Was the I.W.W. hall unlawfully raided? Verdict, "Yes." The evidence introduced convinces us that an attack was made before a shot was fired. 5. Had the defendants a right to defend their hall. Verdict, "yes." On a former occasion the I.W.W. hall was raided, furniture destroyed and stolen, ropes placed around their necks and they were otherwise abused and driven out of town by citizens, armed with pick handles. 6. Was Warren O. Grimm a party to the conspiracy of raiding the I.W.W. hall? Verdict, "Yes." The evidence i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>  



Top keywords:

Verdict

 

Council

 

evidence

 

Centralia

 

report

 

Central

 
guilty
 

secret

 

conspiracy

 

business


raided
 

Seattle

 

interests

 

meeting

 

Temple

 

Thrall

 

Hubbard

 

Tacoma

 
Hughes
 

William


Police

 
Theodore
 

Scales

 

American

 

situation

 
violated
 

presiding

 
stolen
 

destroyed

 

occasion


furniture

 

abused

 

driven

 

raiding

 

Warren

 

citizens

 

handles

 
defend
 

announced

 

appoint


committee
 
effect
 

convict

 
unlawfully
 
introduced
 
defendants
 

convinces

 

attack

 

Newman

 

motion